Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles T & Helen R Williamson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$600kRecreation & Sports$4k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $61k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$15,000
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$12,000
CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY$12,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$8,000
UNIVERITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$6,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS$6,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $8k → 15%Northern AZ University: $10k → 16%University of Delaware: $8k → 10%Boise State University: $15k → 8%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS: $6k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $6k → 14%HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%UNIVERITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $8k → 10%BLINN COLLEGE DISTRICT: $5k → 14%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%EMBRY RIDDLE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%UNC WILMINGTON: $5k → 12%CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY: $12k → 13%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%SWEET BRIAR: $4k → 13%VA Tech: $20k → 21%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 29%UNIVERSITY OF AZ: $6k → 15%BOISE STATE UNIVERISTY: $15k → 8%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIV: $4k → 20%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%EMBRY RIDDLE: $4k → 12%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 13%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 29%University of Arizona: $10k → 15%BOISE STATE: $12k → 8%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%TEXAS A&M: $4k → 22%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 13%Arizona State University: $8k → 11%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%SAN DIEGO STATE: $10k → 11%Baylor University: $25k → 16%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%AZ STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%SDSU: $6k → 11%Texas A&M University: $5k → 22%UC REGENTS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
IA
IN
CA
VA
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
HI
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 26 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
33

Total granted

$381k
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+6%

Still filing today

42%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +11%
  • CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +13%
  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
9
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
10
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
11
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
12
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbell University; the most unlike its peers is California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $44,000 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYBoise State University: $27,000 · OtherBoise State UniversityWILLIAM & MARY: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of Arizona: $18,000 · OtherTexas A&M University: $18,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+44 more: $253,119 · Other+44 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITYCAMPBELL UNIVERSITY: $32,000 · EducationCAMPBELL UNIVERSITYLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $15,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOHAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationHAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITYHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $6,000 · EducationPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationNew York University: $6,000 · Education+8 more: $18,000 · Education+8 more
Other$431,119Education$173,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPBELL UNIVERSITY: $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $8,996 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMississippi College: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTabor College: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNCW CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO16.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles T & Helen R Williamson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles T & Helen R Williamson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charles T & Helen R Williamson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Charles T & Helen R Williamson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles T & Helen R Williamson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph