Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$146kInternational$139kHuman Services$125kReligion$93kCommunity Improvement$91kArts & Culture$42kHealth$9k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
$7,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REHEMA MINISTRIES DBA IN STEP FOUNDATION$14,000
HENDERSON SETTLEMENT$12,000
ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$10,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$10,000
BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION$7,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$6,000
MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$6,000
HIGH POINT ART COUNCIL$5,000
SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 22%ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 22%ASSOCIATED SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 22%SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $2k → 16%SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $2k → 16%SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$594k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$594k
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +9%
  • AF
    ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +35%
  • BB
    BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +77%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Hope International University

    The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

    Education
    2
    Valley Christian School System

    In the light of the lordship of jesus christ and the authority of god's word, we will educate each unique student in cooperation with the christian community so that he or she is equipped and inspired to make a difference for jesus christ…

    Education
    3
    Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

    To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

    —
    4
    Christianity Today International

    Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

    Religion
    5
    Dallas International University

    As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

    Education
    6
    Corus International Inc

    TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

    Human Services
    7
    Hudsonville Christian School

    To provide a christian grade school education for those desiring it in hudsonville, mi and surrounding areas.

    —
    8
    Trinity School of Durham and Chapel Hill Inc

    To educate students in transitional kindergarten to grade twelve within the framework of christian faith and conviction--teaching the classical tools of learning; providing a rich yet unhurried education; and communicating truth, goodness,…

    Education
    9
    Erskine College and Theological Seminary

    Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

    Education
    10
    Criswell College

    The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

    Education
    11
    Evangel University

    Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

    Education
    12
    Landmark Christian School

    Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is VisionLink; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    05the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/10
    Grantees still filing
    7/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    REHEMA MINISTRIES DBA IN STEP FOUNDATION: $114,000 · OtherREHEMA MINISTRIES DBA IN STEP FOUNDAT…MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $54,000 · OtherMISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLHIGH POINT ART COUNCIL: $42,000 · OtherHIGH POINT ART COUNCIL+1 more: $5,000 · OtherBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $77,000 · InternationalBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUN…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $51,000 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION …InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $93,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Chris…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $11,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $86,000 · EducationABINGTON FRIENDS…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HIGH POINT INC: $6,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN S…HENDERSON SETTLEMENT INC: $91,000 · Community ImprovementHENDERSON SETTL…VisionLink: $9,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $6,000 · Human Services
    Other$215,000International$128,000Religion$104,000Education$92,000Community Improvement$91,000Human Services$15,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $93,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHENDERSON SETTLEMENT INC: $91,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $86,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $77,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $54,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $51,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVisionLink: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HIGH POINT INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
    • Who funds HENDERSON SETTLEMENT INC ↗
    • Who funds ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
    • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
    • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
    • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
    • Who funds VisionLink ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HIGH POINT INC ↗
    • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Charles H & Annetta R Masland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Charles H & Annetta R Masland’s filings →

      More from the funding graph