Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Charles Barkley Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$6.2MPhilanthropy$250kHuman Services$221kFood & Nutrition$100kArts & Culture$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.7M
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY$200,000
EDUCATION REFORM NOW$100,000
PATHS FOR SUCCESS FOUNDATION$100,000
LEEDS CITY SCHOOLS$100,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$100,000
BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY$100,000
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
SPELMAN UNIVERSITY$100,000
MOREHOUSE COLLEGE$100,000
TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY$100,000
HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS$100,000
FOLDS OF HONOR ALABAMA CHAPTER$100,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR$100,000
ST MARY'S ACADEMY$100,000
MILES COLLEGE$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STREET GRACE: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
NJ
CA
AZ
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 15 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$5.8M
$400k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+32%

Still filing today

47%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Clark Atlanta University Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $900k · revenue +55%
  • MC
    MOREHOUSE COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +69%
  • TU
    Tuskegee University
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NE GEORGIA
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • MF
    MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Allen University

Allen University is an academic community which provides students an opportunity to obtain baccalaureate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs in traditional and distance education formats. The University has a…

Education
8
Morningside University

The morningside university experience cultivates a passion for life-long learning and a dedication to ethical leadership and civic responsibility.

Education
9
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
10
Bennett College

To offer women an education conducive to excellence in scholarly pursuits, preparation for leadership roles in the workplace, society, and the world, and life-long learning in a technologically advanced, complex global society.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spelman College; the most unlike its peers is Vidal Access Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY: $500,000 · OtherALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITYWOUNDED WARRIOR: $500,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORLEEDS HIGH SCHOOL: $494,568 · OtherLEEDS HIGH SCHOOLLEEDS CITY SCHOOLS: $425,000 · OtherLEEDS CITY SCHOOLSCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NE GEORGIA: $250,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NE GEORGIAWOUNDED WARRIORS: $200,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORSJACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherJACKSON STATE UNIVERSITYSPELMAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherSPELMAN UNIVERSITYAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AUBURN AL: $198,500 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AUBURN AL+6 more: $355,700 · Other+6 moreClark Atlanta University Inc: $900,000 · EducationClark Atlanta University IncMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $700,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE COLLEGEMiles College Inc: $500,000 · EducationMiles College IncTuskegee University: $400,000 · EducationTuskegee UniversityAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONBETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationBETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY+4 more: $283,500 · Education+4 moreMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $100,000 · Community ImprovementMUSIC WILL INC: $18,375 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $2,300 · Arts & CultureStreet Grace Inc: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$3,323,768Education$3,283,500Food & Nutrition$100,000Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$20,675Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClark Atlanta University Inc: $900,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $700,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMiles College Inc: $500,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTuskegee University: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION REFORM NOW INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR ALABAMA CHAPTER: $100,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS: $100,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetVIDAL ACCESS INC: $80,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetStreet Grace Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMUSIC WILL INC: $18,375 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpelman College: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Miles College Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION REFORM NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR ALABAMA CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS ↗
  • Who funds VIDAL ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Street Grace Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC WILL INC ↗
  • Who funds Spelman College ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles Barkley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles Barkley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Bethune-Cookman University: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Charles Barkley Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Charles Barkley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles Barkley’s filings →

More from the funding graph