· Private foundation
The Charles & Matilda Weeks Foundation Attn Calvin Rider
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GUADALUPE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $5,500 |
| OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP - DREXEL | $4,500 |
| CENTER OF HOPE | $4,000 |
| DEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES | $3,060 |
| A BETTER CHOICE | $3,000 |
| BIRTHLINE INCORPORATED | $2,000 |
| CHOICES MEDICAL CLINIC INC | $2,000 |
| WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME | $2,000 |
| EMBRACE OF WICHITA INC | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ABA BETTER CHOICE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +292%
- DNDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +271%
- CMCHOICES MEDICAL CLINIC INC8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- PCPREGNANCY CRISIS CENTER INCone grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
To be first choice of anyone facing an unplanned pregnancy, with a vision to make make abortions unthinkable for all who come to us.
The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.
Help women with the necessary care they need to avoid an abortion
An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
Help women who are pregnant by giving them options to save their baby.
Our mission is to provide spiritual, emotional, educational and material support to expectant mothers and fathers who are faced with an un-planned pregnancy so they may successfully carry their babies to term, based on catholic social and…
Crisis pregnancy councelling
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Center of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds A BETTER CHOICE INC ↗
- Who funds DEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHLINE INC ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE OF WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP INC ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds GERARD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Health Foundation ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · United Way of the Plains Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Charles & Matilda Weeks Foundation Attn Calvin Rider funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles & Matilda Weeks Foundation Attn Calvin Rider. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Charles & Matilda Weeks Foundation Attn Calvin Rider’s filings →