Skip to content
The Charles & Marjorie Holloway Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Charles & Marjorie Holloway Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.7MHuman Services$680kHealth$575kYouth Development$125k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $600k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$150,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$400,000
EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL$150,000
GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY$150,000
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$150,000
DE LA SALLE ACADEMY$150,000
THE SUMMER CAMP$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $680k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $175k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $150k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $135k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $100k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $100k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 11 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$5.8M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-36%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DL
    DE LA SALLE ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +19%
  • GJ
    GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +26%
  • EW
    EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
4
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
5
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
6
Windward School

Windward school is a dynamic college-preparatory school that challenges each student to achieve excellence in a nurturing, inclusive community. windward teachers, parents, and administrators work together to inspire our students to be…

Education
7
Morristown-Beard School

Morristown beard school is an educational college preparatory school in grades 6 to 12 located in morristown, new jersey.

Education
8
Lowell School

Lowell school (the school) provides educational services to approximately 314 students in grades pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. the school strives to create a diverse, equitable, and inclusive learning environment, and offers a…

Education
9
The Columbus Academy

The columbus academy aspires to be an inclusive community where all differences consistent with the mission of the school are valued, respected, and integrated into the education process.

Education
10
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
11
Gilman School Incorporated

Gilman school is a diverse community dedicated to educating boys in mind, body and spirit through particular emphasis upon academic excellence, athletic participation and aesthetic appreciation. gilman seeks to produce men of character and…

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of the Lawrenceville School; the most unlike its peers is The Summer Camp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,250,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyDE LA SALLE ACADEMY: $1,140,000 · EducationDE LA SALLE ACADEMYGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $1,110,000 · EducationGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMYEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $1,069,670 · EducationEMMA WILLARD SCHOOLWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $325,000 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC+1 more: $25,000 · EducationFRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL OF NY: $483,920 · OtherFRENCH AMERIC…ADELPHI ACADEMY: $160,556 · OtherADELPHI ACADE…THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $100,000 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS…FRIENDS OF PHILIP'S NEWARK INC: $100,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF PH…CENTER FOR STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION: $70,000 · OtherCENTER FOR ST…+1 more: $25,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $680,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILD…BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $575,000 · HealthBROWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Education$5,919,670Other$939,476Human Services$680,000Health$575,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,250,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDE LA SALLE ACADEMY: $1,140,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $1,110,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $1,069,670 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $680,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $575,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $325,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetADELPHI ACADEMY: $160,556 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $100,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF PHILIP'S NEWARK INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds DE LA SALLE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ADELPHI ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PHILIP'S NEWARK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMER CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Charles & Marjorie Holloway Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Charles & Marjorie Holloway Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles & Marjorie Holloway’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home