Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Chandy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$52kEducation$43kHealth$32kFood & Nutrition$23kInternational$21kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$125
Median grant
17
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,891
PEACE FOUNDATION$4,793
Individual grant recipient$2,839
Individual grant recipient$2,604
SHALOM KARUNIYA TRUST$2,317
Individual grant recipient$1,725
Individual grant recipient$1,300
LIZAS HOME$1,179
Individual grant recipient$1,160
CITY TEAM MINISTRIES$1,150
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,075
N P CHACKO$895
2414 WORLD$750
EV AJI B$690
SMILE TRAIN$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 66% of grant dollars ($145k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 34% that went abroad ($76k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%PROJECT RESCUE FOUNDATION: $200 → 15%MERCY CHEFS: $200 → 20%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $100 → 26%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%MERCY CHEF: $105 → 20%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $250 → 8%KONTAGIOUS: $500 → 8%KONTAGIOUS: $500 → 8%KONTAGIOUS: $500 → 8%KONTAGIOUS: $250 → 8%KONTAGIOUS: $250 → 8%KONTAGIOUS: $100 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $650 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $130 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $57 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 34% of all-years giving ($76k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$76k · 39 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Chandy Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Chandy Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 34% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$154k · 51 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
69

Total granted

$154k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-1%

Still filing today

43%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalReligionPhilanthropyHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +32%
  • TF
    THE FIELD SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +443%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AC
    ARTESIAN COLLOBRATIVE LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • JC
    JOHN CANDY FOR CHARITY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
2
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
3
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
4
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
9
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
10
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
11
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
12
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
20/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,318 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEACE FOUNDATION: $16,661 · OtherPEACE FOUNDATIONARTESIAN COLLOBRATIVE LLC: $10,000 · OtherARTESIAN COLLOBRATIVE LLC+97 more: $91,569 · Other+97 moreCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $12,101 · ReligionREACH INDIA INTERNATIONAL: $1,651 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $802 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $600 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $600 · Religion+1 more: $350 · ReligionMercy Ships International: $2,355 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,650 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,336 · InternationalPROFESSIONALS INTERNATIONAL: $1,200 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $350 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $300 · International+4 more: $325 · InternationalTHE FIELD SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,212 · Human ServicesKONTAGIOUS: $2,100 · Human ServicesTHE VARKEY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $400 · Human ServicesMERCY CHEFS INC: $305 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $300 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $250 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $200 · Human ServicesPROJECT RESCUE FOUNDATION: $200 · Human Services+1 more: $25 · Human ServicesSan Francisco City Impact: $1,350 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC: $263 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $110 · PhilanthropyLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$182,408Religion$16,104International$7,516Education$7,500Human Services$5,992Youth Development$1,350Philanthropy$473

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $12,101 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIELD SCHOOL: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,710 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,355 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,212 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKONTAGIOUS: $2,100 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetREACH INDIA INTERNATIONAL: $1,651 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco City Impact: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,336 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROFESSIONALS INTERNATIONAL: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $802 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS: $690 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VARKEY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetScripture Union: $352 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $305 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC: $263 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PRO-LIFE ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT RESCUE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $101 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE FIELD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds KONTAGIOUS ↗
  • Who funds REACH INDIA INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco City Impact ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS15.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Chandy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Chandy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chandy Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph