· Public charity
The Center for Cultural Power
Artists transform the world through their powerful art: stories, images, and songs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $322,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $699,836 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $377,336 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $298k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROBERT GUMBINER FOUNDATION DBA PACIFIC ISLAND ETHNIC ART MUSEUM (FISCALLY S | $75,000 |
| SEEDS OF ANCESTRAL RENEWAL (SOAR) (FISCALLY SPONSORED BY SOL COLLECTIVE) | $62,500 |
| BAY AREA AMERICAN INDIAN TWO-SPIRITS (BAAITS) (FISCALLY SPONSORED BY SEVENT | $60,000 |
| CUNAMACU (FISCALLY SPONSORED BY CUBACARIBE) | $50,000 |
| LUKE MADRIGAL INDIGENOUS STORYTELLING NONPROFIT | $50,000 |
| OMNIRA INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $316k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 33% of The Center for Cultural Power’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +393% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NEO Philanthropy Inc4× · 2017–2023 · $735k · revenue +191%
ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC2× · 2017–2023 · $450k · revenue +393%- RGROBERT GUMBINER FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- TNTHE NATHAN CUMMINGS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue -56%
- TWTHE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $210k · revenue +52%
- CMContinental Micronesia Inc Association of Pacific Island Legislatures Medic al Mission Foundationone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ARTNOIR is a global collective and a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to celebrate and highlight the work of creatives of color from around the world while catalyzing cultural equity across the arts and culture industries.…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Alternate Roots,Inc (ROOTS) was formed to meet the distinct needs of artists who work for social justice, and artists who create work by,for,about and within communities of place, tradition, affiliation and spirit.
Raise awareness of social justice
Indigenous Performance Productions was created with the mission to produce, promote, present, manage and advance education around Indigenous performing arts and artists. Indigenous Performance Productions was founded on the vision to…
The Oakland Institute, an independent policy think tank, works to support global struggles for Indigenous rights, human rights, and land rights and to promote public participation and fair debate on critical social, economic, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truartspeaks and the most unlike its peers is Anatolian Arts Institue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATHAN CUMMINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROBERT GUMBINER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Continental Micronesia Inc Association of Pacific Island Legislatures Medic al Mission Foundation ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds FLOWERS AND BULLETS ↗
- Who funds ACORN Center For Restoration & Freedom ↗
- Who funds COLIBRI CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
- Who funds SURDNA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS THEATER TEATRO FRONTERIZO INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds Spirithouse South Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTO CULTURAL ARTS ↗
- Who funds DECIMANIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER ↗
- Who funds Independent Arts & Media ↗
- Who funds Southern Fried Queer Pride Inc ↗
- Who funds ANANYA DANCE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds NA KALAI WA'A ↗
- Who funds PAULI MURRAY CENTER FOR HISTORY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
- Who funds THE LUKE MADRIGAL STORYTELLING NON PROFI ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMING GENERATIONS TG ↗
- Who funds YOUNG OF HEART WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds CUBACARIBE ↗
- Who funds UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Trucha ↗
- Who funds MEZTLI PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds Pegasus Media Project ↗
- Who funds FAST BLACKFEET ↗
- Who funds Indigenous Roots ↗
- Who funds TRUARTSPEAKS ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · The Ford Foundation · The California Endowment · WK Kellogg Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Center for Cultural Power funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.