Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cedars Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$319k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$718kEducation$386kCommunity Improvement$302kSocial Science$289kInternational$173kArts & Culture$110kPublic Benefit$69kAnimals$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$71,500
RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE$40,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$40,000
SEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS$40,000
THE COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THE CONFERENCE BOARD$25,000
SHENANDOAH VALLEY CONSERVANCY$25,000
LSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO MANS ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL$15,000
THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE$10,000
AMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSITY$10,000
WATERFORD FOUNDATION$7,500
RICHARD III SOCIETY$6,000
SOCIETY OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS$5,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$3,000
PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE MEDICINE$2,000
THE CARTER CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES: $5k → 29%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 73 repeat orgs$309k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
64

Total granted

$1.9M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+46%

Still filing today

68%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $311k · revenue +58%
  • Resources for the Future Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $255k · revenue +21%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $151k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • TC
    THE CONFERENCE BOARD COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • C
    CED
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
12
Natural Resource Governance Institute

Nrgi envisions a world where natural resources enable fair, prosperous and sustainable societies, instead of undermining them. nrgi exists because decisions about how natural resources are governed determine the well-being of people in…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hamilton Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/80
Grantees still filing
66/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $310,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYResources for the Future Inc: $255,000 · EnvironmentResources for the Future IncVALLEY CONSERVATION COUNCIL: $86,500 · EnvironmentVALLEY CONSERVATION COUNCIL+8 more: $29,500 · Environmentcommittee for economic development: $81,000 · Othercommittee for economic develop…HARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $70,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE FUNDTHE COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONFERENCE BOARD: $50,000 · OtherTHE COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEV…SHENANDOAH VALLEY CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · OtherTHE COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THE CONFERENCE BOARD: $25,000 · OtherTHE CONFERENCE BOARD COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $25,000 · OtherCED: $25,000 · Otherfriend of the sea: $20,000 · Other+88 more: $275,958 · Other+88 moreAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $125,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR O…THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $105,000 · EducationTHE ROOSEVELT I…AMER TR FOR OXFORD UNIV & EASTMAN 067381-000: $40,000 · EducationAMER TR FOR OXF…LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $24,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUN…+6 more: $8,300 · EducationTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $150,500 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INS…LSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO HUMAN ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL: $107,750 · Social ScienceLSB LEAKEY FD…THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $10,000 · Social ScienceCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $50,000 · InternationalCOOPERATI…THE HENRY L STIMSON CENTER: $46,000 · InternationalTHE HENRY…COALITION FOR INTEGRITY INC: $45,000 · InternationalCOALITION…THE CARTER CENTER INC: $17,000 · InternationalTHE CARTE…COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $11,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL O…ASHOKA: $7,000 · International+4 more: $15,250 · International+4 moreSEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS INC: $120,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWaterford Foundation Inc: $31,600 · Arts & CultureRICHARD III SOCIETY INC: $13,500 · Arts & CultureGIRL BE HEARD INSTITUTE: $7,500 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,900 · Arts & CultureHULLS ANGELS INC: $2,350 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $2,250 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $3,050 · Arts & Culture
Environment$681,500Other$596,958Education$302,300Social Science$268,250International$191,250Philanthropy$121,000Arts & Culture$63,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $310,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetResources for the Future Inc: $255,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $150,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS INC: $120,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO HUMAN ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL: $107,750 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $105,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CONSERVATION COUNCIL: $86,500 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HENRY L STIMSON CENTER: $46,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR INTEGRITY INC: $45,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetAMER TR FOR OXFORD UNIV & EASTMAN 067381-000: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWaterford Foundation Inc: $31,600 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD III SOCIETY INC: $13,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NISKANEN CENTER INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL BE HEARD INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASHOKA: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL BUDGET: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE LEGAL ALLIANCE INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBRETTON WOODS COMMITTEE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATURE CAMP INC: $2,550 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESPONSE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetHULLS ANGELS INC: $2,350 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE STUDIOS OF KEY WEST: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHETERODOX ACADEMY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHamilton Volunteer Fire Department: $1,800 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS: $1,650 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSMITH POINT SEA RESCUE: $1,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Resources for the Future Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds SEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LSB LEAKEY FDTN FOR RESEARCH RELATED TO HUMAN ORIGINS BEHAVIOR AND SURVIVAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CONSERVATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HENRY L STIMSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR INTEGRITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMER TR FOR OXFORD UNIV & EASTMAN 067381-000 ↗
  • Who funds Waterford Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD III SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NISKANEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds Outward Bound Center for Peacebuilding ↗
  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds GIRL BE HEARD INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY18.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ford Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Impactassetsinc · Carnegie Corporation of New York · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cedars Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cedars Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cedars’ filings →

More from the funding graph