Skip to content

· Private foundation

The CB&A Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$375kEducation$145kHuman Services$38kHousing & Shelter$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kInternational$18kFood & Nutrition$15kArts & Culture$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS HOUSTON$51,244
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$16,857
CY HOPE$15,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$12,000
ARMOR OF HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
REALTORS RELIEF FOUNDATION$10,000
YES TO YOUTH MONTGOMERY COUNTY$5,000
CHRISTMAS ANGELS INC$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MCTX$5,000
ISAIAH 117 HOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
TOMBALL ISD$4,250
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY$3,500
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$3,000
NEW LIFE ADOPTIONS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ARMOR OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ARMOR OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%KATY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 16%BE A RESOURCE: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
IL
VA
AR
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 15 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
34

Total granted

$549k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+18%

Still filing today

53%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CY-HOPE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +131%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • WA
    Wreaths Across America
    4× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • LR
    LA Realtor Relief Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • EJ
    Edward Jones
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • CF
    COLLINS FAMILY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Bair Foundation of Texas

To provide services to children, youth, and families along with a child-placing agency. to provide therapeutic foster care.

Human Services
2
Houston Serenity Place Inc

To provide a clean, safe, nurturing environment for children placed by child protective services.

—
3
Halo House Foundation

Halo House's mission is to help save the lives of cancer patients battling leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma by providing them with low-cost, fully furnished temporary housing while undergoing active cancer treatment at the Texas Medical…

Health
4
Trees of Hope

Trees of hope transforms lives with fundraising and outreach activities for the exclusive benefit of childrens programs at star of hope, houston's largest mission for the homeless.

Housing & Shelter
5
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

—
6
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
7
Starr of Hope

The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.

Housing & Shelter
8
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
9
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
10
Fostering Family

Fostering family dba the riverside project is a 501(c)(3) public charity that on behalf of houston's children and their families, brings together organizations and passionate people working as one to help families heal and children thrive.

Community Improvement
11
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
12
Leaders of Texas Foundation Inc

To provide housing and training for troubled children.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS: $164,338 · OtherBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS HOUSTON: $161,099 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS HOUSTONSAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $44,000 · OtherSAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY+44 more: $199,756 · Other+44 moreCY-HOPE INC: $75,000 · EducationCY-HOPE INC+2 more: $2,300 · EducationARMOR OF HOPE FOUNDATION OF KATY: $15,000 · Human ServicesISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $7,500 · Human ServicesBEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS: $2,591 · Human ServicesKaty Christian Ministries: $2,500 · Human ServicesRealtors Relief Foundation: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWreaths Across America: $10,000 · Public BenefitNEW HOPE YOUTH CENTER INC: $7,500 · HealthSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$569,193Education$77,300Human Services$27,591Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Public Benefit$10,000Health$7,500Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCY-HOPE INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE YOUTH CENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW LIFE ADOPTIONS: $7,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $2,925 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS: $2,591 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKaty Christian Ministries: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HARRIS MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCY-FAIR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CY-HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMOR OF HOPE FOUNDATION OF KATY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Realtors Relief Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE ADOPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Katy Christian Ministries ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HARRIS MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX16.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Baker Hughes Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The CB&A Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The CB&A Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on CB&A’s filings →

    More from the funding graph