Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cary Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$261k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$779kCrime & Legal$411kHuman Services$146kPhilanthropy$103kReligion$94kScience & Tech$71kArts & Culture$51kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $171k
$16,382
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$100,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$71,003
FACIAL PARALYSIS BELLS PAKY$20,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$19,278
TRINITY COLLEGE$16,382
WEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK$15,000
CHRIST CHURCH$13,000
CARVER CAREER AND TECHNICAL$4,761
BRIDGE VALLEY COMM AND TECH$1,584
SOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE$294
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $12k → 17%JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $5k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $59k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $57k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
CT
CA
WV
VA
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 8 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
23

Total granted

$1.3M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

25%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WV CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK
    3× · 2017–2019 · $411k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $354k
  • NU
    NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $142k

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    one grant, 2017 · $65k · revenue +13%
  • BC
    BIBLE CENTER CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • BC
    BUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
2
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Georgetown College

Georgetown college is a fully accredited liberal arts institution of higher learning located in georgetown, kentucky. the college is committed to providing opportunities for excellence in higher learning under christian influences so as to…

Education
5
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
6
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
9
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
10
Transylvania University

Through an engagement with the liberal arts, transylvania university prepares its students for a humane and fulfilling personal and public life by cultivating independent thinking, open-mindedness, creative expression and commitment to…

Education
11
Fairness Wv Institute Inc

Provide education and grassroots advocacy about issues of importance to lgbt west virginians.

Civil Rights
12
The West Virginia Humanities Council Inc

The west virginia humanities council awards grants to others, directly funds certain projects, e-wv an online interactive program, and conducts seminars and conferences throughout the state of west virginia.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WV CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK: $411,000 · OtherWV CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKYALE UNIVERSITY: $354,354 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $142,475 · OtherNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $103,856 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITYBIBLE CENTER CHURCH: $50,000 · Other+21 more: $240,856 · Other+21 moreTRINITY COLLEGE: $105,302 · EducationTRINITY COLLEG…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $71,003 · EducationPresident and …THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $64,620 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY…YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $130,963 · Human ServicesYMCA OF K…COVENANT HOUSE: $12,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $102,500 · PhilanthropyWEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK: $15,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsJackson County Public Library Association: $3,000 · Arts & CultureFAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,302,541Education$240,925Human Services$147,963Philanthropy$102,500Animals$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$3,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $130,963 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $105,302 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $102,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $71,003 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $64,620 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds Jackson County Public Library Association ↗
  • Who funds FAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Herscher Foundation Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cary Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cary Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cary’s filings →

More from the funding graph