Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cary Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$261k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Education$779kCrime & Legal$411kHuman Services$146kPhilanthropy$103kReligion$94kScience & Tech$71kArts & Culture$51kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $171k
$16,382
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$100,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$71,003
FACIAL PARALYSIS BELLS PAKY$20,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$19,278
TRINITY COLLEGE$16,382
WEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK$15,000
CHRIST CHURCH$13,000
CARVER CAREER AND TECHNICAL$4,761
BRIDGE VALLEY COMM AND TECH$1,584
SOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE$294
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $12k → 17%JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $5k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $59k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $57k → 18%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
CT
CA
WV
VA
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 8 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
23

Total granted

$1.3M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

25%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCivil RightsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WV CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK
    3× · 2017–2019 · $411k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $354k
  • NU
    NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $142k

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    one grant, 2017 · $65k · revenue +13%
  • BC
    BIBLE CENTER CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • BC
    BUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
2
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Georgetown College

Georgetown college is a fully accredited liberal arts institution of higher learning located in georgetown, kentucky. the college is committed to providing opportunities for excellence in higher learning under christian influences so as to…

Education
5
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

6
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

9
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
10
Transylvania University

Through an engagement with the liberal arts, transylvania university prepares its students for a humane and fulfilling personal and public life by cultivating independent thinking, open-mindedness, creative expression and commitment to…

Education
11
Fairness Wv Institute Inc

Provide education and grassroots advocacy about issues of importance to lgbt west virginians.

Civil Rights
12
The West Virginia Humanities Council Inc

The west virginia humanities council awards grants to others, directly funds certain projects, e-wv an online interactive program, and conducts seminars and conferences throughout the state of west virginia.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Covenant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WV CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK — $411,000 · OtherWV CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKYALE UNIVERSITY — $354,354 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $142,475 · OtherNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY — $103,856 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITYBIBLE CENTER CHURCH — $50,000 · Other+21 more — $240,856 · Other+21 moreTRINITY COLLEGE — $105,302 · EducationTRINITY COLLEG…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $71,003 · EducationPresident and …THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $64,620 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY…YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC — $130,963 · Human ServicesYMCA OF K…COVENANT HOUSE — $12,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $102,500 · PhilanthropyWEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK — $15,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsJackson County Public Library Association — $3,000 · Arts & CultureFAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC — $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,302,541Education$240,925Human Services$147,963Philanthropy$102,500Animals$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$3,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC — $130,963 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $105,302 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $102,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $71,003 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $64,620 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK — $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HORSE NETWORK
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC
  • Who funds Jackson County Public Library Association
  • Who funds FAIRNESS WEST VIRGINIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Herscher Foundation Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cary Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph