Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$512k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHousing & Shelter$292kFood & Nutrition$271kPhilanthropy$220kReligion$90kHuman Services$88kCrime & Legal$84kHealth$82kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $289k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRIDE IN THE TIGER FOUNDATION$75,000
HOPE HARBOR$70,000
SMSU FOUNDATION$45,000
UNITED WAY$42,000
KITCHEN TABLE FOOD SHELF OF MARSHAL$40,000
MARSHALL FOOD 4 KIDS$30,000
TRUE LIGHT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$30,000
MINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION$20,000
HOLY REDEEMER SCHOOL$16,760
MARSHALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
PAYNESVILLE FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY$10,000
MARSHALL AREA YMCA$10,000
MARSHALL CRIME FUND$10,000
SAMUEL LUTHERN SCHOOL$10,000
LIVING WORD CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $10k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $8k → 11%WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS: $7k → 11%WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS: $7k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $6k → 11%WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS: $5k → 11%WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS: $5k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $5k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $2k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $2k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $2k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $2k → 11%HELP TUCK THEM IN: $2k → 11%HELP TUCK THEM IN: $1k → 11%MARSHALL AREA YMCA: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 44 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -81% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
7

Total granted

$2.3M
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-81%

Still filing today

32%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PRIDE IN THE TIGER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +63%
  • HH
    HOPE HARBOR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $292k · revenue +97%
  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue -81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership

To partner with communities to develop places for people to call home so that people in southwest and south-central minnesota have access to dignified affordable housing, and thriving, inclusive and equitable communities.

Housing & Shelter
2
Young Men's Christian Association

We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.

Human Services
3
Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

Minnesota state college southeast foundation assists the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers, and communities within our service area.

Education
4
Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation

Southern minnesota initiative foundation is a regional development and philanthropic organization that fosters economic and community vitality in 20 counties of southern minnesota through a culture of collaboration and partnership, with a…

Community Improvement
5
Twin Valley Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the twin valley council inc., boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. the council serves 69…

—
6
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
7
Leadership Matters Mn

Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.

Education
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
10
Communities in Schools of the Twin Cities

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
11
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

—
12
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is True Light Christian School; the most unlike its peers is Marshall FOOD4KIDS. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $169,500 · OtherUNITED WAYTRUE LIGHT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $127,850 · OtherTRUE LIGHT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLKITCHEN TABLE FOOD SHELF OF MARSHAL: $110,100 · OtherKITCHEN TABLE FOOD SHELF OF MARSHALHOLY REDEEMER SCHOOL: $96,960 · OtherHOLY REDEEMER SCHOOLMARSHALL CRIME FUND: $60,000 · OtherMARSHALL CRIME FUNDPRAIRIE HOME HOSPICE INC: $59,650 · OtherPRAIRIE HOME HOSPICE INCMARSHALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherLIVING WORD CHURCH: $40,000 · Other+34 more: $270,040 · Other+34 morePRIDE IN THE TIGER FOUNDATION: $410,120 · EducationPRIDE IN THE TIGER FOUNDATIONSOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $290,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FO…MINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION: $117,000 · EducationMINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATIONHOPE HARBOR: $292,100 · Housing & ShelterHOPE HARBORMARSHALL FOOD4KIDS: $140,000 · Food & NutritionMARSHALL AREA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $38,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS: $24,000 · Human ServicesHelp Tuck Them In Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $16,500 · Community ImprovementSTRONG TOWNS: $2,000 · Community ImprovementREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $5,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $1,800 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · HealthTEENPACT LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS INC: $2,000 · Religion
Other$1,028,100Education$817,120Housing & Shelter$292,100Food & Nutrition$140,000Human Services$64,500Community Improvement$18,500Health$7,300Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRIDE IN THE TIGER FOUNDATION: $410,120 over 9y, 15% of budgetHOPE HARBOR: $292,100 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $290,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMARSHALL FOOD4KIDS: $140,000 over 7y, 56% of budgetTRUE LIGHT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $127,850 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetMINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION: $117,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetPRAIRIE HOME HOSPICE INC: $59,650 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetMARSHALL AREA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $38,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS: $24,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelp Tuck Them In Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTEENPACT LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTRONG TOWNS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRIDE IN THE TIGER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL FOOD4KIDS ↗
  • Who funds TRUE LIGHT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE HOME HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL AREA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Help Tuck Them In Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southwest Initiative FoundationMN19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southwest Initiative Foundation · Avera Health · Communitygiving · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way of Southwest Minnesota · Sanford Group Return · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Carr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Carr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph