Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$179kEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$31kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$4kCommunity Improvement$730Philanthropy$500Animals$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH$3,000
AMERICAN CHESTNUT FDN$1,000
MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS$750
NH FARM MUSEUM$500
ACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHED ALLIANCE$500
SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FO$500
MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENER$500
THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOC$500
THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST$500
LAND TRUST ALLIANCE$500
BEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS$500
Individual grant recipient$400
NH ASSOC OF CONSERVATION COMMISSION$250
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF NH$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%LAND TRUST ALLIANCE: $2k → 14%FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $1k → 10%AMERICAN CHESTNUT FDN: $2k → 12%SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH: $64k → 5%UNH COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $10k → 7%SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FORESTS: $5k → 7%THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 9%THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOC: $1k → 9%MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENER: $1k → 13%LAND TRUST ALLIANCE: $1k → 14%AMERICAN CHESTNUT FDN: $1k → 12%SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH: $10k → 5%UNH COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $10k → 7%SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FO: $1k → 7%NH FARM MUSEUM: $2k → 9%THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOC: $1k → 9%MOFGA: $1k → 13%AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH: $5k → 5%UNH COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $5k → 7%SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FO: $1k → 7%THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST: $1k → 9%MOFGA: $1k → 13%AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH: $3k → 5%UNH COOP EXTENSION SAVING SPECIAL PLACES: $1k → 7%SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FORESTS: $1k → 7%NH FARM MUSEUM: $1k → 9%MOFGA: $1k → 13%AMERICAN CHESTNUT FDN: $1k → 12%SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH: $3k → 5%UNH COOP EXTENSION SAVING SPECIAL PLACES: $1k → 7%SPACE: $1k → 7%NH FARM MUSEUM: $1k → 9%AMERICAN CHESTNUT FDN: $1k → 12%SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $1k → 5%UNH COOP EXTENSION SAVING SPECIAL PLACES: $1k → 7%NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMERS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 7%MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $11k → 9%MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $10k → 9%MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $7k → 9%UNH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%UNH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%UNH COOP EXTENSION: $10k → 9%UNH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%UNH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%UNH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in NH; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Tteelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 34 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -87% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
4

Total granted

$277k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-87%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire
    7× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +23%
  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • MM
    MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • S
    SPACE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -87% · 25% of their budget
  • NE
    NONGAME & ENDANGERED WILDLIFE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presumpscot Regional Land Trust

We engage with communities to conserve, steward, and provide access to local lands and clean water for current and future generations to enjoy.

—
2
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
3
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
4
Upper Saco Valley Land Trust

The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…

Food & Nutrition
5
Royal River Conservation Trust

The royal river conservation trust (rrct) is a regional land trust working primarily in seven maine municipalities. the trust owns,cares for, and stewards land and conservation easements to protect land and water resources for the general…

Environment
6
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
7
Nashoba Conservation Trust

Acquire, preserve and maintain natural resources and wildlife habitat areas (land conservation).

Environment
8
Aspetuck Land Trust

Founded in 1966, Aspetuck Land Trust is a non-profit membership ogranization whose mission is to protect land forever and connect people to the natural world.

Environment
9
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
10
Ammonoosuc Conservation Trust

To protect open spaces with conservation, historic or scenic value, including agricultural and forested lands, and wildlife habitats, within the western White Mountains region of Northern New Hampshire.

Environment
11
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
12
Lakes Region Conservation Trust

The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Three Rivers Land Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Space. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire: $86,500 · PhilanthropySoutheast Land Trust of New Hampsh…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyUNH COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $25,000 · OtherUNH COOPERATIVE EXTENSIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNH FARM MUSEUM: $6,750 · OtherNH FARM MUSEUMSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FORESTS: $6,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF N…THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOC: $4,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FO: $4,000 · OtherMOFGA: $3,500 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF NH: $3,000 · OtherUNH COOP EXTENSION SAVING SPECIAL PLACES: $3,000 · Other+16 more: $14,730 · Other+16 moreMOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $31,304 · EnvironmentMOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GR…THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $9,628 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUND…LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INCBEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $5,500 · EnvironmentBEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYSACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHEDS ALLIANCE: $5,500 · EnvironmentACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHEDS …THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · EnvironmentTHREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSO…THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 · Environment+4 more: $5,000 · Environment+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW H…THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $2,075 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$87,000Other$79,980Environment$70,432Education$50,000Youth Development$2,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSoutheast Land Trust of New Hampshire: $86,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $31,304 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $9,628 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS: $5,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHEDS ALLIANCE: $5,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $2,075 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE RIVERS LAND TRUST: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWentworth Watershed Association: $1,050 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSPACE: $1,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION GROUP: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS ↗
  • Who funds ACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHEDS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Wentworth Watershed Association ↗
  • Who funds SPACE ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Davis Conservation FoundationME19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Davis Conservation Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Adelard & Valeda Roy Foundation · Open Space Institute Land Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee?

    Find your warmest path to The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph