· Private foundation
The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNH FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NH | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN CHESTNUT FDN | $1,000 |
| MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS | $750 |
| ACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHED ALLIANCE | $500 |
| THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST | $500 |
| MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENER | $500 |
| LAND TRUST ALLIANCE | $500 |
| THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOC | $500 |
| NH FARM MUSEUM | $500 |
| BEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS | $500 |
| SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NH FO | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| NH ASSOC OF CONSERVATION COMMISSION | $250 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY OF NH | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in NH; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -87% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSoutheast Land Trust of New Hampshire7× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +37%
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +28%- MMMOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS7× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
- SSPACEone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -87% · 25% of their budget
- NENONGAME & ENDANGERED WILDLIFE PROGRAMone grant, 2019 · $200
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We engage with communities to conserve, steward, and provide access to local lands and clean water for current and future generations to enjoy.
The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…
The royal river conservation trust (rrct) is a regional land trust working primarily in seven maine municipalities. the trust owns,cares for, and stewards land and conservation easements to protect land and water resources for the general…
To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.
Acquire, preserve and maintain natural resources and wildlife habitat areas (land conservation).
Founded in 1966, Aspetuck Land Trust is a non-profit membership ogranization whose mission is to protect land forever and connect people to the natural world.
Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…
To protect open spaces with conservation, historic or scenic value, including agricultural and forested lands, and wildlife habitats, within the western White Mountains region of Northern New Hampshire.
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Three Rivers Land Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is Space. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MOOSE MOUNTAINS REGIONAL GREENWAYS ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds BEAR-PAW REGIONAL GREENWAYS ↗
- Who funds ACTON WAKEFIELD WATERSHEDS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THREE PONDS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Wentworth Watershed Association ↗
- Who funds SPACE ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION GROUP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Davis Conservation Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Adelard & Valeda Roy Foundation · Open Space Institute Land Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee?
Find your warmest path to The Carl Siemon Family Charitable Trust Cynthia Wyatt Et Al Ttee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.