Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$104kHousing & Shelter$35kEducation$27kHealth$20kYouth Development$15kFood & Nutrition$13kAnimals$12kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$820k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN$3,500
AMPHI FOUNDATION$3,500
PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$2,500
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$2,500
TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS$2,500
COMM HOME REPAIRS PROJECTS OF AZ$2,000
CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHAB SVCS$2,000
CARING MINISTRIES$1,500
TMM FAMILY SERVICES INC$1,000
MOBILE MEALS OF TUCSON INC$1,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,000
PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SO AZ$1,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TUCSON$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $1k → 18%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $500 → 18%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $2k → 11%CASA ESPERANZA PARA NINOS: $1k → 11%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $4k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $3k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $3k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $3k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $3k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $3k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $3k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $2k → 15%MARSHALL HOME FOR MEN: $2k → 15%ST LUKE'S IN THE DESERT: $2k → 15%BEACON GROUP: $2k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $1k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 15%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 15%HANDI-DOGS INC: $1k → 15%ST LUKE'S HOME: $500 → 15%HANDI-DOGS INC: $750 → 15%HANDI-DOGS INC: $625 → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $3k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $3k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $3k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $3k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $3k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $3k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$226k · 27 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
15

Total granted

$226k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+48%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    Marshall Home for Men INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +42%
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +138%
  • IC
    Interfaith Community Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • BG
    BEACON GROUP INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +6%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

—
4
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
5
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
6
Southeastern Arizona Community Unique Services

To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.

Health
7
Old Pueblo Community Services

Established in 1996, Old Pueblo Community Services has delivered housing and support services for people facing homelessness in Pima County. The organization serves various populations, including families, veterans, youth, individuals with…

Philanthropy
8
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
9
The Dons of Arizona
Education
10
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
11
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
12
Az Hugs
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Housing Resources Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marshall Home for Men Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
25/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Interfaith Community Services: $15,750 · OtherInterfaith Community ServicesCOMM HOME REPAIRS PROJECTS OF AZ: $14,750 · OtherCOMM HOME REPAIRS PROJECTS OF AZAmphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc: $13,625 · OtherAmphitheater Public Schools Foundation IncBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED: $11,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPOR…Our Family Services Inc: $9,600 · OtherOur Family Services IncRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $7,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESARIZONA VETERANS MEM CEMTERY FOUND: $6,000 · OtherTMM Family Services Inc: $6,000 · OtherLEND A HAND SENIOR ASSISTANCE INCORPORATED: $5,000 · OtherFAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES INC: $4,000 · Other+17 more: $19,265 · Other+17 moreMarshall Home for Men INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesMarshall Home for Men INCYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20,075 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWNPima Council on Aging: $14,250 · Human ServicesPima Council on AgingCasa Esperanza Para Ninos: $13,050 · Human ServicesCasa Esperanza Para NinosSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $3,950 · Human Services+3 more: $4,875 · Human Services+3 morePUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $13,500 · EducationMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $11,500 · Food & NutritionIntegrative Touch: $7,650 · HealthCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: $2,000 · HealthHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $6,450 · AnimalsThe Hermitage No Kill Cat Shelter: $1,000 · AnimalsCOCHISE CANINE RESCUE: $700 · AnimalsCARING MINISTRIES INC: $4,500 · Religion
Other$112,990Human Services$80,200Education$13,500Food & Nutrition$11,500Health$9,650Animals$8,150Religion$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarshall Home for Men INC: $24,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20,075 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $15,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPima Council on Aging: $14,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc: $13,625 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Esperanza Para Ninos: $13,050 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $11,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOur Family Services Inc: $9,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIntegrative Touch: $7,650 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $6,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTMM Family Services Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCARING MINISTRIES INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $3,950 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANDI-DOGS INC: $2,375 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEACON GROUP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN OUTREACH PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1,975 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hermitage No Kill Cat Shelter: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SUN CORRIDOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marshall Home for Men INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
  • Who funds Pima Council on Aging ↗
  • Who funds Amphitheater Public Schools Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Casa Esperanza Para Ninos ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds Our Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Integrative Touch ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
  • Who funds TMM Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds St Lukes in the Desert Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds HANDI-DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BEACON GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN OUTREACH PREGNANCY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hermitage No Kill Cat Shelter ↗
  • Who funds COCHISE CANINE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ49.8× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Haugh Foundation · The Kai Family Foundation · Frederick Gardner Cottrell Foundation · Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl & Mabel Shurtz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph