Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Carl a Lemcool Memorial Foundation Inc

TO SUPPORT CHARITABLE, SCIENTIFIC, LITERARY AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES, BY MAKING GIFTS, GRANTS AND DISTRIBUTIONS REQUIRED IN THE BYLAWS OF THE EXCHANGE CLUB OF TRAVERSE CITY.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of THE CARL A LEMCOOL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$38,000
GRAND TRAVERSE AREA VETERANS COALITION$8,000
CENTRAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH COMMUNITY OUTREACH$5,000
PROJECT FEED THE KIDS$5,000
TCAPS - STUDENT SUPPORT NETWORK$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SINGLE MOMM: $38k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 29% of The Carl a Lemcool Memorial Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Carl a Lemcool Memorial Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$80k · 3 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$80k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+56%

Still filing today

33%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GRAND TRAVERSE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k
  • TB
    TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
    2× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • TS
    TCAPS STEP PROGRAM
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • MP
    MICHAEL'S PLACEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +52%
  • SM
    SINGLE MOMMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +156%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $23k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRAND TRAVERSE CONSERVATION DISTRICT — $50,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE CONSERVATION DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient — $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWE — $23,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWETRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $20,000 · OtherTRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTERCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES — $12,000 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY SERVICESCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $11,341 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INCTCAPS STEP PROGRAM — $10,000 · OtherBOARDMAN RIVER CLEAN SWEEP — $10,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE AREA VETERANS COALITION — $8,000 · Other+4 more — $18,152 · Other+4 moreMICHAEL'S PLACE — $50,000 · HealthMICHAEL'S PLACESINGLE MOMM — $37,525 · Human ServicesSINGLE MOMMVETERANS IN CRISIS — $10,000 · Public BenefitPROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$200,493Health$50,000Human Services$37,525Public Benefit$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMICHAEL'S PLACE — $50,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetSINGLE MOMM — $37,525 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWE — $23,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $11,341 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS IN CRISIS — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE
  • Who funds SINGLE MOMM
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWE
  • Who funds TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds VETERANS IN CRISIS
  • Who funds PROJECT FEED THE KIDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · The Broad Family Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Canton Community Foundation Inc · Consumers Energy Foundation · Impact 100 of Traverse City Inc · Kegley Family Foundation · Les & Ann Biederman Foundation Inc · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Carl a Lemcool Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph