Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Capture Cares Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$511k
Granted FY2020
20
Grants FY2020
14
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $251k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
San Antonio Christian School$250,000
Nevada Health Centers Inc$25,729
Community Health Centers of the Central Coast$25,000
Lamprey Health Care Inc$25,000
Richford Health Center Inc$25,000
Philadelphia Fight$24,963
Kittitas County Public Hospital District #1$24,879
Cornerstone Family Healthcare$20,000
McCloud Healthcare Clinic Inc$20,000
Optimus Health Care Inc$20,000
Blue Ridge Community Health Services$20,000
Gaston Family Health Services Inc$20,000
Lincoln Community Hospital$6,956
AHS Gordon Hospital$500
Otsego Memorial Hospital$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Philadelphia Fight: $25k → 22%Marshall Medical Center: $500 → 8%Community Health Centers of the Central Coast: $25k → 12%McCloud Healthcare Clinic Inc: $20k → 16%Mountain Valleys Community Health Centers: $500 → 17%Anthony L Jordan Health Center: $500 → 14%Cornerstone Family Healthcare: $20k → 14%San Antonio Christian School: $250k → 16%Fetter Healthcare Network Inc: $500 → 12%Otsego Memorial Hospital: $500 → 11%Optimus Health Care Inc: $20k → 9%Gaston Family Health Services Inc: $20k → 12%Blue Ridge Community Health Services: $20k → 12%AHS Gordon Hospital: $500 → 12%Lincoln Community Hospital: $7k → 16%Kittitas County Public Hospital District #1: $25k → 11%Nevada Health Centers Inc: $26k → 13%Richford Health Center Inc: $25k → 9%Lamprey Health Care Inc: $25k → 5%NEAH Valley Regional Hospital: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MI
NY
NV
PA
CT
CA
CO
NC
SC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
2
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
3
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
4
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
5
Upper Valley Comm Health Services Inc

UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…

Health
6
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
7
Mendocino Coast Clinics Inc

Mendocino Coast Clinics

—
8
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
9
Norwalk Community Health Center

To provide quality, innovative care that enriches the lives of our patients.

Health
10
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
11
Family Health Services Corporation

Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.

Health
12
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fetter Health Care Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Antonio Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLRICHFORD HEALTH CENTER INC: $25,000 · OtherRICHFORD HEALTH CENTER INCKittitas County Public Hospital District #1: $24,879 · OtherKittitas County Public Hospital District #1GASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 · OtherGASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INCBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC+6 more: $9,456 · OtherNEVADA HEALTH CENTERS INC: $25,729 · HealthNEVADA HEALTH CENTERS INCCommunity Health Centers of the Central Coast Inc: $25,000 · HealthCommunity Health Centers of the Cen…Lamprey Health Care Inc: $25,000 · HealthLamprey Health Care IncPHILADELPHIA FIGHT: $24,963 · HealthPHILADELPHIA FIGHTOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $20,000 · HealthOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INCCORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $20,000 · HealthCORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCAREMCLOUD HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC: $20,000 · HealthMCLOUD HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC+2 more: $1,000 · Health
Other$349,335Health$161,692

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNEVADA HEALTH CENTERS INC: $25,729 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Centers of the Central Coast Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHFORD HEALTH CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLamprey Health Care Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA FIGHT: $24,963 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFETTER HEALTH CARE NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Capture Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Capture Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Optimus Health Care Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Richford Health Center Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Capture Cares Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Capture Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Capture Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph