Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Grants FY2025
26
Organizations funded FY2024
4%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$6,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$12,000
Organizations funded a year
25 to 28
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$1.6M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 4% of the organizations The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving26$157k0%
FY202426$138k4%
FY202328$126k11%
FY202226$135k4%
FY202125$124k0%
FY202026$125k4%
FY201927$140k7%
FY201826$142k4%
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$319kHuman Services$192kHealth$147kFood & Nutrition$140kAnimals$135kEnvironment$103kEducation$44kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 25 recipients with no EIN on record ($918k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Mary's Community Services: $78,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetDelta Stockton Humane Society & Society For The PR: $76,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetAnimal Friends Connection Humane Society: $57,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetThe Stockton Chorale: $47,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin: $25,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPrevail Ca: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSeeds to the World Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMaui Food Bank Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaui Humane Society: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Joaquin Community Foundation IncCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Stockton Rotary Endowment · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director with peer funders

About The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director

How much does The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director give?
The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director reported 26 grants totaling $157,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 25 and 28 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (26%), Human Services (16%), Health (12%).
Who are The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: St Mary's Community Services ($78k), Delta Stockton Humane Society & Society For The PR ($76k), Animal Friends Connection Humane Society ($57k).
Does The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 4% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc, The Cortopassi Family Foundation, Stockton Rotary Endowment.
Where is The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director based?
The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director’s filings →

More from the funding graph