· Public charity
Stockton Rotary Endowment
To provide allocations and payments to san joaquin county, california, charitable organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $50,971 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $99,460 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,489 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TLC FOUNDATION FOR HOMELESS | $16,316 |
| READ TO ME STOCKTON | $13,000 |
| MARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDAT | $10,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN JOAQUIN | $6,287 |
| EMERGENCY FOOD BANK | $5,368 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -6% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTLC Foundation for Homeless Children of San Joaquin County7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue -49% · 28% of their budget
- RTRead to Me Stockton6× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue -16%
- SMST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES7× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +828%
Funded once
- OVOTHER VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONSone grant, 2018 · $31k
- SUSTOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1852 FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $6k
- SJST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUINone grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Stockton 209 cares is a local nonprofit that empowers the homeless in becoming self sugffient and employs them to clean up . we work with the homeless in finding housing and other resources. stockton 209 cares holds several community events
To help reduce homelessness and support low income families in san joaquin county to achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.
Homeless Shelter
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.
The mission of shrp is to provide harm reduction services to people who use drugs and unhoused individuals in san joaquin county.
CHS guides youth and young adults forward to hope and resiliency.
To assist persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless to find and retain stable and affordable housing.
Respecting the presence of God among us, we serve, advocate for and empower those in need. In carrying out the social mission of the Roman Catholic Church in the Diocese of Fresno, the Organization provides food, clothing, housing support,…
Serve the homeless and hungry families by providing food and basic life necessities and by partnering with other social service and government agencies for the purpose of ending homelessness, improving mental health conditions, restoring…
Outreach to those in need within the diocese of san jose. provides assistance in the form of spiritual (visits to the sick and imprisoned) or tangible services (assistance with rent, utilities,furniture, clothing, and medical expenses).
Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Read to Me Stockton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TLC Foundation for Homeless Children of San Joaquin County ↗
- Who funds Read to Me Stockton ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Delta Stockton Humane Society & Society For The PR ↗
- Who funds PREVAIL CA ↗
- Who funds Hospice of San Joaquin ↗
- Who funds MARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1852 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN ↗
- Who funds Stockton Shelter For The Homeless ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Crete Family Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · Vaquero Foundation · The 54 Fund · Sunlight Giving · The C a Webster Foundation Co Bonner W Mendez Director · Michael Family Foundation · Coastal Barrier Island Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stockton Rotary Endowment funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.