Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Bunker Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
13
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$50,000
States reached, FY2017
8
Total assets, FY2017
$54k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NV
CA
VA
NM
OK
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($5k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Bunker Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCurriki: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAfrican Education Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Track: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarty Hennessy Inspiring Children Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe George W Bush Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Aubri Brown Club: $7,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFolds of Honor Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasey Lee Ball Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEddy House: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Bunker Foundation with peer funders

About The Bunker Foundation

How much does The Bunker Foundation give?
The Bunker Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $210,000 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does The Bunker Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Education (52%), International (24%), Health (6%).
Who are The Bunker Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Curriki ($50k), African Education Foundation ($50k), Teach for America Inc ($25k).
Does The Bunker Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Bunker Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Bunker Foundation based?
The Bunker Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bunker’s filings →

More from the funding graph