· Private foundation
The Bulova Stetson Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $400k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VETERANS WATCHMAKER INITIATIVE | $60,000 |
| STETSON UNIVERSITY INC | $60,000 |
| MULTI-DISCIPLIANARY PSYCHADELIC RESEARCH (MAPS) | $55,000 |
| INNOCENCE PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHOLOGY FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| ST VINCENT FERRER HIGH SCHOOL | $34,000 |
| ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| UNITED STATES WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FUND INC | $30,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR THERAPEUTIC DISCOVERY INC | $25,000 |
| PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC | $16,000 |
| EMPIRE STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA | $15,000 |
| THANK YOU LIFE | $15,000 |
| VETERANS EXPLORING TREATMENT SOLUTIONS | $15,000 |
| FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC | $10,000 |
| RED HOOK INITIATIVE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $636k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC7× · 2018–2024 · $270k · revenue +178%
- NYNew York University4× · 2019–2024 · $223k · revenue +51%
- VWVETERANS WATCHMAKER INITIATIVE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $163k · revenue +230% · 34% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $20k
- OFOld Friends Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +90%
- ANAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSSone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Education, research, medical services and other public services.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement and the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds VETERANS WATCHMAKER INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
- Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds The Institute for Therapeutic Discovery Inc ↗
- Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
- Who funds CORO NEW YORK LEADERSHIP CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds CAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds HARC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The New York Community Trust · Pinkerton Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Pwc Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Open Society Institute · The San Francisco Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bulova Stetson Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Harc Inc — 92% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Veterans Watchmaker Initiative Inc — 34% of income from government
- Stetson University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Bulova Stetson Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Bulova Stetson Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.