Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Buck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$351k
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.1MAnimals$122kCommunity Improvement$56kFood & Nutrition$54kHealth$52kArts & Culture$38kCrime & Legal$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k67 grants · $259k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $92k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROGERS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$30,000
NWA HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
NWA FOOD BANK$20,000
FIRST FRIENDS PRESCHOOL$12,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON CO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
CIRCLE OF LIFE HOSPICE$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SEVEN HILLS HOMELESS CENTER: $5k → 14%AVA RONCK: $2k → 8%AVA RONCK: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 190 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

190 repeat relationships: 70 still active in FY2025, 120 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

190
97

Total granted

$2.3M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+360%

Still filing today

5%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    ROGERS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +92%
  • NA
    NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $54k · revenue +22%
  • ON
    Ozark Natural Science Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
2
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
3
Northeast Arkansas Children's Advocacy Center Inc

The northeast arkansas children's advocacy center provides a child appropriate, safe setting for children to tell their story of abuse.

Crime & Legal
4
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
5
Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc

The organization provides a therapeutic shelter and care for homeless and/or abused children.

Housing & Shelter
6
Northwest Arkansas Children's Shelter in Dba Everhope Arkansas Inc

To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.

Human Services
7
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc

The alliance is a collaborative organization that works on behalf of arkansans facing hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
9
Arkansas Land & Farm Development Corporation

The organization provides training and service assistance to farm development, community education programs, land retention, program management, housing, rural and community development

Food & Nutrition
10
Rise House Arkansas

To provide assistance to victims of domestic abuse and to educate the community to work toward the prevention of family violence.

Human Services
11
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
12
New Generation Inc

Usher in leadership & policies that make arkansas the best place to live, work, and raise a family.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rogers Development Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Avants Group Living Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 289 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST FRIENDS PRESCHOOL: $101,000 · Other+191 more: $2,140,380 · Other+191 moreROGERS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationOzark Natural Science Center Inc: $28,000 · EducationFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10,000 · EducationROGERS PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $37,000 · ReligionARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $13,000 · HealthSEVEN HILLS HOMELESS CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAVANTS GROUP LIVING CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesEXCELLERATE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,241,380Education$93,000Religion$37,000Health$13,000Human Services$9,000Philanthropy$5,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROGERS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $54,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROGERS PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetBEAVER LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOzark Natural Science Center Inc: $28,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF: $13,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSEVEN HILLS HOMELESS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEXCELLERATE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAVANTS GROUP LIVING CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROGERS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ROGERS PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Ozark Natural Science Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wal-Mart FoundationAR15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Buck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Buck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 289 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph