Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bruce and Beth White Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$9.2MHealth$1.8MYouth Development$895kHuman Services$349kRecreation & Sports$194kPublic Safety & Disaster$91kArts & Culture$81kPhilanthropy$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $477k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$11,210
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$800,000
PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$500,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$300,000
PLATTE VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER FOUN$102,475
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$100,000
BACK ON MY FEET FOUNDATION$74,335
FRIENDS OF SARATOGA LIBRARY$50,000
VALLEY VILLAGE CHILDCARE$50,000
NORTH PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
SARATOGA LIONS CLUB$50,000
SARATOGA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$47,665
CHURCH OF ST ANN$25,000
GRAND ENCAMPMENT MUSEUM$24,100
MITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$20,000
ENCAMPMENT RIVERSIDE FRIENDS OF LIB$15,218
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VALLEY VILLAGE CHILDCARE: $50k → 12%VALLEY VILLAGE CHILDCARE: $50k → 12%BRIDGE STREET BARGAINS: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 25 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$12M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+237%

Still filing today

28%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    8× · 2017–2025 · $6.7M · revenue +67%
  • Purdue Research Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +39%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2025 · $894k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CM
    CORBETT MEDICAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +282%
  • WS
    WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +237%
  • MG
    MCCORD GALLERY CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shields Valley Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Trustees of Purdue University

Foster, encourage, and provide the means and facilities for the education of young people

—
3
North Dakota Cowboy Hall of Fame in

Education and preservation of western heritage

Arts & Culture
4
Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming Endowment Foundation Inc

To support the Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming through a Building Fund, Endowment Fund, and Educational Fund

Youth Development
5
Cheyenne Valley Community Foundation
Public Benefit
6
Greater Loup Valley Activities
—
7
Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation

Advancing student success through partnerships with the community and Sheridan College.

Education
8
Valley County Community Foundation

To educate the community on the value of philanthropy and to fund projects in five areas of common life in valley county: arts and culture, basic human needs, economic development, education, and natural resources and conservation.

Philanthropy
9
Wyoming School Foundation

To enhance the honored tradition of academic excellence for the children of wyoming, ohio and to enrich their lives and the lives of others.

—
10
Wyoming Natural Resource Foundation

Promote, maintain, and assist informational educational and research projects related to natural resource conservation

Environment
11
Valley City State University Foundation

Valley City State University Foundation aids in the advancement of Valley City State University by awarding scholarships and by promoting the University. Support comes primarily from contributions by individuals and businesses, fundraising…

—
12
Western Wyoming College Foundation

Support of western wyoming community college programs and scholarships

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Valley Village Childcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Big Shoulders Fund: $6,742,980 · EducationBig Shoulders FundPurdue Research Foundation: $1,500,000 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation+1 more: $2,275 · EducationBACK ON MY FEET FOUNDATION: $1,577,549 · OtherBACK ON MY FEET FOUNDATIONPURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST: $850,000 · OtherPURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWESTPLATTE VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER FOUN: $223,250 · OtherPLATTE VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTE…+30 more: $607,423 · Other+30 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $893,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $750 · Youth DevelopmentVALLEY VILLAGE CHILDCARE: $100,000 · Human ServicesBridge Street Bargains: $6,500 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsCORBETT MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthPLATTE VALLEY LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $28,575 · PhilanthropyMITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyPLATTE VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,860 · Arts & Culture
Education$8,245,255Other$3,258,222Youth Development$894,250Human Services$106,500Recreation & Sports$100,000Health$50,000Philanthropy$48,575Arts & Culture$1,860

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $6,742,980 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $1,500,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $893,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetVALLEY VILLAGE CHILDCARE: $100,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetNorthwestern University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORBETT MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGRAND ENCAMPMENT MUSEUM INC: $32,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetPLATTE VALLEY LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $28,575 over 2y, 24% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCarbon County Child Development Programs: $2,275 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY VILLAGE CHILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds CORBETT MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA LIONS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GRAND ENCAMPMENT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PLATTE VALLEY LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridge Street Bargains ↗
  • Who funds Carbon County Child Development Programs ↗
  • Who funds PLATTE VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gretchen Swanson Family FoundationNE24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gretchen Swanson Family Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bruce and Beth White Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bruce and Beth White Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bruce and Beth White Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bruce and Beth White Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bruce and Beth White Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph