Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Brent and Kathryn Wood Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$330k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$823kReligion$770kHousing & Shelter$745kHuman Services$230kArts & Culture$27kYouth Development$3kHealth$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
  • $250k+2 grants · $605k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS$330,000
FRIENDS OF THE COALITION$275,000
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$110,000
SCENICVIEW ACADEMY INC$100,000
FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC$100,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-HAWAII$45,000
EAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE$25,000
UTAH METROPOLITAN BALLET$18,000
UTAH REGIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION$10,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$10,000
CLIMBHI INC$5,530
YES EDUCATION$2,000
ACADEMY FOR CREATING ENTERPRISE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 10 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$2.4M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
-23%

Still filing today

80%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ScenicView Academy
    5× · 2020–2024 · $325k · revenue +71%
  • UV
    UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $280k · revenue +5%
  • UR
    UTAH REGIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $145k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN CRISIS INCORPORAT
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • TW
    THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -23%
  • KA
    KAHUKU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Utah Enterprises

To provide services to disabled persons with a focus on assisting individuals in Utah County with cognitive disabilities gain skills to enable them to enter the workforce.

—
2
Utah Arts Academy

Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education
3
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

—
4
Shelter Providers of Utah

To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

—
5
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
6
Rural Housing Development Corporation

To provide quality affordable housing opportunities to individuals and families living in Utah.

Housing & Shelter
7
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Utah Scholarship Foundation

To provide scholarships for Utah residents between the ages of 18 and 28 who have graduated from high school and are seeking additional educational opportunities.

Education
9
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
10
Utah Valley Home Builders Foundation in

To provide charitable grants to Brigham Young University and other educational institutions and to provide educational assistance and scholarship grants.

Education
11
Timpanogos Academy Foundation

To establish a school where each student gains the scholarly knowledge and skills vital to becoming a self-motivated, lifelong learner and to succeed in the rapidly evolving and complex world. This mission will be accomplished by using the…

Education
12
Ability 1st Utah

Assisting persons with disabilities to develop independent living and social skills, assisting with housing and transportation needs, rights advocacy, and counseling.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Washington County School District Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Utah Metropolitan Ballet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $770,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAI…BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-HAWAII: $185,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-HAWAII+8 more: $66,900 · Other+8 moreScenicView Academy: $325,000 · EducationScenicView AcademyUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 · EducationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOU…FRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY: $600,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE COALITION F…UTAH REGIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION: $145,000 · Housing & ShelterUTAH REGIO…EAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterEAGLES WIN…FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesUtah Metropolitan Ballet: $25,500 · Arts & CultureAcademy for Creating Enterprise: $2,000 · InternationalYES EDUCATION: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,021,900Education$605,000Food & Nutrition$600,000Housing & Shelter$245,000Human Services$100,000Arts & Culture$25,500International$2,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY: $600,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetScenicView Academy: $325,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH REGIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION: $145,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetEAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE: $100,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUtah Metropolitan Ballet: $25,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLIMBHI: $7,900 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAcademy for Creating Enterprise: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYES EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ScenicView Academy ↗
  • Who funds UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH REGIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds Utah Metropolitan Ballet ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLIMBHI ↗
  • Who funds Academy for Creating Enterprise ↗
  • Who funds YES EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ashton Family FoundationUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ashton Family Foundation · Wheelwright Family Charitable Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · University Impact · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Brent and Kathryn Wood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Brent and Kathryn Wood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Brent and Kathryn Wood Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Brent and Kathryn Wood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brent and Kathryn Wood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph