Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Branscomb Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$137kScience & Tech$80kAnimals$58kPublic Benefit$49kArts & Culture$35kCivil Rights$24kSocial Science$23kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$4,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$641k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE$30,000
INTERNET ARCHIVES$10,000
VANDERBILT$6,000
GCSU FOUNDATION$6,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$6,000
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER F$5,000
GLOBAL HARMONY FOUNDATION$5,000
AET LIBRARY ENDOWMENT$4,000
INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH MIDDLE EASTERN POLICY$4,000
THE COUNCIL FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST FOUNDATION$4,000
CODEPINK$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BAY AREA COMMUNITY LAW FOUNDATION$2,500
FREE FLIGHT$2,500
BACKBONE CAMPAIGN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION: $8k → 12%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $10k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $2k → 9%THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE: $30k → 15%INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION: $1k → 12%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $5k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE: $25k → 15%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $4k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $2k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $2k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $2k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $2k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $1k → 10%BACKBONE CAMPAIGN: $1k → 9%INTERNET ARCHIVES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 38 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
16

Total granted

$438k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+17%

Still filing today

58%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesScience & TechArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMPASSION INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $82k · revenue +8%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $55k · revenue +9%
  • IA
    Internet Archive
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • NG
    NABU GLOBAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • TF
    Tibet Fund Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
4
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
American Political Science Association

The american political science association ("apsa") supports excellence in scholarship and teaching and informed discourse about politics, policy, and civic participation. the association promotes a lively, diverse community of scholars,…

Social Science
7
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
8
American Society of International Law

To foster the study of international law and to promote international relations on the basis of law and justice.

International
9
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
10
Council of Institutional Investors

Educate/advocate for effective corporate governance and public company disclosure, strong shareholder rights and fair capital markets.

—
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassion Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST: $25,000 · OtherUNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTVANDERBILT: $18,000 · OtherVANDERBILTAET LIBRARY ENDOWMENT: $14,250 · OtherAET LIBRARY ENDOWMENTGCSU FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherGCSU FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,250 · OtherCO FREEDOM OF INFO COALITION: $7,500 · OtherMI ELECTION REFORM ALLIANCE: $7,250 · OtherGEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 · OtherTHE WEBB SCHOOL BELL BUCKLE TN: $7,000 · OtherTHE WEBB SCH BELL BUCKLE TN: $7,000 · Other+24 more: $63,750 · Other+24 moreCOMPASSION INSTITUTE INC: $81,973 · EducationCOMPASSION INSTITUTE INCNABU GLOBAL INC: $10,000 · EducationNABU GLOBAL INCCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $7,000 · EducationCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACECITIZENS OVERSIGHT INC: $6,250 · EducationCITIZENS OVERSIGHT INC+2 more: $5,500 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE …Internet Archive: $28,500 · Human ServicesInternet ArchiveBackbone Campaign: $9,250 · Human ServicesBackbone CampaignINWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesINWARD BOUND MINDFULNES…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $11,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST F: $9,250 · InternationalTibet Fund Inc: $5,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $5,000 · InternationalEmpowerment Works Inc: $2,000 · InternationalNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $17,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $6,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS INC: $5,000 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $1,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $17,000 · Social ScienceCoalition for Good Governance: $5,250 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$195,000Education$110,723Human Services$101,750International$32,250Science & Tech$29,000Social Science$17,000Arts & Culture$11,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPASSION INSTITUTE INC: $81,973 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetInternet Archive: $28,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAET LIBRARY ENDOWMENT: $14,250 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNABU GLOBAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBackbone Campaign: $9,250 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST F: $9,250 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetINWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITIZENS OVERSIGHT INC: $6,250 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition for Good Governance: $5,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVerified Voting Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFREE FLIGHT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowerment Works Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ELECTION SCIENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAREI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMPASSION INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Internet Archive ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds AET LIBRARY ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NABU GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Backbone Campaign ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST F ↗
  • Who funds INWARD BOUND MINDFULNESS EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GEOHAZARDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS OVERSIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Good Governance ↗
  • Who funds Tibet Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR THE NATIONAL INTEREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Branscomb Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Branscomb Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences: 3% of income from government
  • American Institute of Physics Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Branscomb Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Branscomb Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Branscomb Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph