· Private foundation
The Bradburd Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k56 grants · $875k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $710k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SERVICE COMMITTEE | $150,000 |
| MEADVILLE LOMBARD THEOLOGICAL SCHOOL | $120,000 |
| NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT | $70,000 |
| POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC OF LAS CRUCES NEW MEXICO | $60,000 |
| ARTIST TRUST | $60,000 |
| SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD | $50,000 |
| UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY ROOTS HOUSING FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| FACING HOMELESSNESS | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE DERBY BRATS | $50,000 |
| GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE | $40,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA & KY INC | $40,000 |
| PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UUUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $287k · revenue +27%
- AHABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $151k · revenue +150%
PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION7× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- SFSACRED FIRE UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISTone grant, 2017 · $15k
- UCUU CHURCH OF ANNAPOLIS-AWAKE MINISTRIESone grant, 2017 · $5k
- UMUU MINISTERS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…
The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.
To inform its members and the community in public matters and to arouse in them the realization of the obligations of citizenship.
Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…
To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.
To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights, and to take action to further those liberties and rights within the state of washington.
To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.
On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Environmental Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC OF LAS CRUCES NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds Artist Trust ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds FACING HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds Community Roots Housing Foundation ↗
- Who funds Seattle Derby Brats ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds Gender Justice League ↗
- Who funds ROOTS YOUNG ADULT SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Spectrum Dance Theater ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OVERSIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FOULKEWAYS AT GWYNEDD ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE JAZZ FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds Therapeutic Health Services ↗
- Who funds EL PASO MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SHARING NOTES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAS CRUCES ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds DR KAREN M TRUJILLO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CRUCES CREATIVES ↗
- Who funds MURRAY GROVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COYOTE CENTRAL ↗
- Who funds Seattle JazzED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Artsfund · The Norcliffe Foundation · Raynier Institute & Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Gates Foundation · Lorna Jordan Charitable Organization AKA Lorna Jordan Foundation · Raikes Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · United Way of King County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bradburd Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.