Skip to content

· Public charity

The Boot Campaign Inc

Unites Americans to honor and restore the lives of veterans and military families through individualized, life-improving care.

$762k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$367k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.3MYouth Development$572kRecreation & Sports$40kHuman Services$26kPublic Benefit$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $743,471, the rows itemized in this filing. The $762,221 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $244k
  • $250k+1 grant · $367k
$28,991
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Warrior Wellness$366,974
Virginia High Performance$121,575
Wisdom Works$63,000
The University of Texas at Dallas$59,275
Simply Aware LLC$39,865
Heartmath LLC$28,991
Cooper Clinic$26,131
Catalyzt Nutrition$11,344
Prenuvo USA$7,596
Misty Valley Wellness$6,800
Home Counseling Group$6,670
Resilient Village Collective$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE: $8k → 14%Resilient Village Collective: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of The Boot Campaign Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 44% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 55%.

The Boot Campaign Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 16 repeat orgs$458k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$5.2M
$447k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+18%

Still filing today

31%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEMPER FIT INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +142% · 75% of their budget
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $61k · revenue +38%
  • HH
    HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $44k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • CF
    CIJ FOUNDATION- UNIV OF CO ANSCHUTZ
    one grant, 2019 · $120k
  • CF
    CU FOUNDATION-UNV CO
    one grant, 2018 · $120k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Wounded Warrior Project Inc

Wounded warrior project (wwp) is the nation's leading veterans service organization, focused on the total well-being of post - 9/11 veterans, active-duty service members, and their families. our programs, advocacy, and awareness efforts…

Human Services
4
Peaceful Warrior Foundation

The peaceful warrior foundation is a non-profit organization with the aim of connecting our nation's warriors with the support and care they need.at peaceful warrior we strive to help our active-duty operators & veterans be at their very…

Human Services
5
Holistic Healing for Heroes Inc

Our military vetreans, heroes, suffer from ptsd, post-concussion brain syndrome and various emotional disorder at a much higher rate than the general population. we will offer replacement therapy in the form of naturally occurring herbal…

Health
6
Military Wellness Initiative
Public Benefit
7
Home Front Warriors Project

We help veterans and first responders relieve symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress syndrome so they can live better. we are a non-profit post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress syndrome clinic for…

—
8
Frontline Strong

Therapy services for frontline workers such as military, police officers and fire fighters. Free mental heath services.

—
9
22ZERO Follow Me Inc

To heal and train veterans, first responders, and gold star families using a non-invasive, non-clinical, peer-to-peer, holistic intervention, to save lives and families of our heroes, while ending suicide and trauma with the trauma…

Health
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace

The david lynch foundation for consciousness-based education and world peace (the "foundation or "dlf") is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005. the foundation helps to prevent and eradicate the epidemic of trauma and toxic…

Philanthropy
12
Freedom Revived

Freedom Revived is here to bring a proactive approach to serving those who serve us. We provide support and encouragement through a variety of services that revitalize mind, body, and spirit to our Frontline.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heroic Hearts Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Resilient Village Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA HIGH PERFORMANCE LLC: $1,687,567 · OtherVIRGINIA HIGH PERFORMANCE LLCTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH: $634,300 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTHCOOPER CLINIC: $609,236 · OtherCOOPER CLINICSIMPLY AWARE LLC: $282,273 · OtherSIMPLY AWARE LLCWISDOM WORKS CONSULTING LLC: $173,750 · Other+15 more: $634,494 · Other+15 moreSEMPER FIT INCORPORATED: $1,087,008 · HealthSEMPER FIT INCORPORATEDFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION: $453,824 · HealthFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATIONINSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH: $60,616 · Health+1 more: $12,500 · HealthHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $44,350 · InternationalRESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE INC: $12,750 · Human ServicesTEXAS WOUNDED WARRIORS: $10,000 · Public BenefitTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,400 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$4,021,620Health$1,613,948International$44,350Human Services$12,750Public Benefit$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEMPER FIT INCORPORATED: $1,087,008 over 6y, 75% of budgetFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION: $453,824 over 5y, 21% of budgetINSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH: $60,616 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC: $44,350 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE INC: $12,750 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS WOUNDED WARRIORS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEMPER FIT INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH ↗
  • Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS WOUNDED WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Boot Campaign Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Boot Campaign Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Centerstone of Florida Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boot Campaign’s filings →

More from the funding graph