Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Boot Campaign Inc

Unites americans to honor and restore the lives of veterans and military families through individualized, life-improving care.

$999k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$264k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$4.3MYouth Development$572kRecreation & Sports$40kHuman Services$26kPublic Benefit$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $952,064 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $999,462 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,398 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $546k
  • $250k+1 grant · $264k
$21,810
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARRIOR WELLNESS SOLUTIONS$263,594
VIRGINIA HIGH PERFORMANCE LLC$225,980
SIMPLY AWARE LLC$95,760
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS$91,675
COOPER CLINIC$80,432
WISDOM WORKS CONSULTING LLC$52,250
THE VILLAGES GYM$30,000
HEARTMATH LLC$22,051
MISSION READY COUNSELING LLC$21,810
CORE PERFORMANCE LLC$14,250
EHOME COUNSELING GROUP$12,510
GOLDEN OAK PERSONAL TRAINING$9,605
RESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE$7,500
PRENUVO USA$7,347
UT SOUTHWESTERN$6,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of The Boot Campaign Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 44% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 55% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Boot Campaign Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 15 repeat orgs$454k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$4.5M
$407k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+90%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEMPER FIT INCORPORATED
    5× · 2020–2024 · $720k · revenue +142% · 62% of their budget
  • HH
    HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $44k · revenue +77%
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CF
    CU FOUNDATION-UNV CO
    one grant, 2018 · $120k
  • CF
    CIJ FOUNDATION- UNIV OF CO ANSCHUTZ
    one grant, 2019 · $120k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2022 · $80k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

3
Peaceful Warrior Foundation

The peaceful warrior foundation is a non-profit organization with the aim of connecting our nation's warriors with the support and care they need.at peaceful warrior we strive to help our active-duty operators & veterans be at their very…

Human Services
4
Holistic Healing for Heroes Inc

Our military vetreans, heroes, suffer from ptsd, post-concussion brain syndrome and various emotional disorder at a much higher rate than the general population. we will offer replacement therapy in the form of naturally occurring herbal…

Health
5
Military Wellness Initiative
Public Benefit
6
Home Front Warriors Project

We help veterans and first responders relieve symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress syndrome so they can live better. we are a non-profit post traumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress syndrome clinic for…

7
Frontline Strong

Therapy services for frontline workers such as military, police officers and fire fighters. Free mental heath services.

8
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
9
22ZERO Follow Me Inc

To heal and train veterans, first responders, and gold star families using a non-invasive, non-clinical, peer-to-peer, holistic intervention, to save lives and families of our heroes, while ending suicide and trauma with the trauma…

Health
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Freedom Revived

Freedom Revived is here to bring a proactive approach to serving those who serve us. We provide support and encouragement through a variety of services that revitalize mind, body, and spirit to our Frontline.

Human Services
12
David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace

The david lynch foundation for consciousness-based education and world peace (the "foundation or "dlf") is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005. the foundation helps to prevent and eradicate the epidemic of trauma and toxic…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heroic Hearts Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Resilient Village Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VIRGINIA HIGH PERFORMANCE LLC — $1,565,992 · OtherVIRGINIA HIGH PERFORMANCE LLCCOOPER CLINIC — $583,105 · OtherCOOPER CLINICTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH — $575,025 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTHSIMPLY AWARE LLC — $242,408 · OtherSIMPLY AWARE LLC+15 more — $712,834 · Other+15 moreSEMPER FIT INCORPORATED — $720,034 · HealthSEMPER FIT INCORPORATEDFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION — $453,824 · HealthFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATIO…+2 more — $44,125 · HealthHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC — $44,350 · InternationalTEXAS WOUNDED WARRIORS — $10,000 · Public BenefitRESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC — $5,400 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$3,679,364Health$1,217,983International$44,350Public Benefit$10,000Human Services$7,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEMPER FIT INCORPORATED — $720,034 over 5y, 62% of budgetFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION — $453,824 over 5y, 21% of budgetHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC — $44,350 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH — $31,625 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS WOUNDED WARRIORS — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEMPER FIT INCORPORATED
  • Who funds FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF HEARTMATH
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds TEXAS WOUNDED WARRIORS
  • Who funds RESILIENT VILLAGE COLLECTIVE INC
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Boot Campaign Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Centerstone of Florida Inc12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph