Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2018
20
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $74k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’17
15
’18
10
’19
8
’20
2
’21
0
’22
1
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$923kHealth$90kArts & Culture$68kEnvironment$40kFood & Nutrition$33kRecreation & Sports$30kEducation$25kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2018 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k18 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY$15,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK$5,000
NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION$5,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION INC$5,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
GSAS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
WNYC$3,500
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$2,500
CITY HARVEST INC$2,500
THE WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER$2,500
AMERICAL CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC$1,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 22% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER: $3k → 8%THE CAPE AND ISLANDS NPR STATION: $5k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $300k → 7%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%VASSAR COLLEGE: $10k → 9%FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK: $5k → 14%CITY HARVEST INC: $5k → 17%OPERA LAFAYETTE: $5k → 14%THE WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER: $3k → 8%THE CAPE AND ISLANDS NPR STATION: $5k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200k → 7%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK: $5k → 14%CITY HARVEST INC: $3k → 17%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200k → 7%FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK: $5k → 14%CITY HARVEST INC: $3k → 17%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER: $3k → 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $100k → 7%FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK: $4k → 14%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $73k → 7%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 17%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $50k → 7%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 17%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 17%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10k → 17%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10k → 17%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5k → 17%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5k → 17%GSAS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%GSAS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%GSAS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%CORNELL WEILL MEDICINE: $10k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%WNET CHANNEL 13: $5k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY: $25k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY: $25k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY: $15k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY: $10k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 22 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2018, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$310k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $80k · revenue +74%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +76%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
9
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
12
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Quissett Harbor Preservation Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $923,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTPBS NEWSHOUR: $30,000 · OtherPBS NEWSHOURNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK F…FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK: $19,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF NE…REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FR…GSAS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherGSAS COLUMBIA U…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUM…THE CAPE AND ISLANDS NPR STATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE CAPE AND IS…VASSAR COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual gran…+10 more: $26,500 · Other+10 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $80,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $13,500 · Arts & CultureOpera Lafayette: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWNET: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSHED NYC INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCITY HARVEST INC: $13,000 · Food & NutritionFARMING FALMOUTH INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $7,500 · Science & Tech
Philanthropy$923,000Other$178,000Health$90,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Arts & Culture$26,000Food & Nutrition$14,000Science & Tech$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $923,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoodwell Climate Research Center Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOpera Lafayette: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWNET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHED NYC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUISSETT HARBOR PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Opera Lafayette ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHED NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds QUISSETT HARBOR PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMING FALMOUTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Esther Simon 1952 Charitable Trust Xxxxx8006IL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Esther Simon 1952 Charitable Trust Xxxxx8006 · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Bonnie Ward Simon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bonnie Ward Simon’s filings →

More from the funding graph