Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Binkley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$7.9MHealth$351kPhilanthropy$260kHuman Services$16kYouth Development$15kAnimals$13kRecreation & Sports$12kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $106k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KARMA CLUB$15,000
POSITIVE IMAGES$15,000
FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURE$14,600
COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAN DOMENICO SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$7,500
MARIN CATHOLIC$7,000
BREAST RESTORATION MARIN LINK$6,000
MARIN THEATRE CO$5,000
CANCER SUPPORT SONOMA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 34% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 22%Vascular Cures: $7k → 7%KARMA CLUB: $15k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 9%POSITIVE IMAGES: $15k → 9%UC Berkeley Foundation: $250k → 10%UCSF FOUNDATION CANCER CENTER: $1k → 10%BINKLEY CHARITIES-CHARLES MITCHELL: $2.6M → 14%World Central Kitchen: $2k → 14%ARCC TRAVEL STUDY: $10k → 10%BINKLEY CHARITIES-TERRY BINKLEY: $2.6M → 6%CAT CARE SOCIETY: $1k → 7%WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%EVOLVE SECURITY: $10k → 14%VASCULAR CURES: $5k → 7%THE SPAHR CENTER: $1k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 9%CANCER SUPPORT SONOMA: $5k → 9%UC Berkeley Foundation: $10k → 10%UCSF FOUNDATION CANCER CENTER: $1k → 10%Vascular Cures: $250k → 7%MARIN THEATRE CO: $5k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $500 → 9%COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS: $11k → 9%UCBerkeley Foundation for Athletics: $7k → 10%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURE: $30k → 7%MARIN CATHOLIC: $7k → 8%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION FORATHLETICS: $5k → 10%Alzheimers Association: $2k → 10%Vascular Cures: $15k → 7%BREAST RESTORATION MARIN LINK: $6k → 8%FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURE: $15k → 7%BINKLEY CHARITIES-TED BINKLEY FUND: $2.6M → 8%Vascular Cures: $10k → 7%SAN DOMENICO SCHOOL: $10k → 8%CA FILM INSTITUTE: $1k → 8%CA FILM INSTITUTE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
OR
PA
CA
CO
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$614k · 7 repeat orgs$8.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +519% since the first grant, against +79% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$614k
$7.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+519%
+79%

Still filing today

14%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $331k · revenue +519% · 48% of their budget
  • UB
    UC Berkeley Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $260k
  • UF
    UCBerkeley Foundation for Athletics
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k

Funded once

  • BC
    BINKLEY CHARITIES-CHARLES MITCHELL
    one grant, 2022 · $2.6M
  • BC
    BINKLEY CHARITIES-TERRY BINKLEY
    one grant, 2022 · $2.6M
  • BC
    BINKLEY CHARITIES-TED BINKLEY FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $2.6M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
4
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Samuel Merritt University

Samuel merritt university educates students to become highly skilled and compassionate health care professionals who positively transform the experience of care in diverse communities.

Education
10
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
12
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassion Without Borders and the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BINKLEY CHARITIES-CHARLES MITCHELL — $2,624,403 · OtherBINKLEY CHARITIES-CHARLES MITCHELLBINKLEY CHARITIES-TERRY BINKLEY — $2,624,403 · OtherBINKLEY CHARITIES-TERRY BINKLEYBINKLEY CHARITIES-TED BINKLEY FUND — $2,624,403 · OtherBINKLEY CHARITIES-TED BINKLEY FUNDTHE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES — $331,100 · Other+18 more — $383,200 · OtherSAN DOMENICO SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $7,500 · EducationWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY — $1,365 · EducationCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS — $11,000 · AnimalsMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsCAT CARE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsCANCER SUPPORT SONOMA — $5,000 · HealthWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 · International
Other$8,587,509Education$18,865Animals$13,000Health$5,000International$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES — $331,100 over 7y, 48% of budgetPOSITIVE IMAGES — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS — $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN DOMENICO SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT SONOMA — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY — $1,365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAT CARE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE VASCULAR CURES
  • Who funds POSITIVE IMAGES
  • Who funds COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS
  • Who funds SAN DOMENICO SCHOOL
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT SONOMA
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds CAT CARE SOCIETY
  • Who funds The Spahr Center

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Binkley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Binkley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Binkley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph