· Private foundation
The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $514k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+1 grant · $399k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| National Christian Foundation Tampa Bay | $398,750 |
| CITYCommit | $70,500 |
| Discipleship Network of America | $70,000 |
| Hearts Afire Inc | $51,000 |
| Christian Legal Society | $50,000 |
| Door of Hope Ministry Inc | $50,000 |
| Water Missions International | $50,000 |
| Answers In Genesis | $50,000 |
| Avenue941 Inc | $50,000 |
| Child & Parental Rights Campaign Inc | $50,000 |
| Support After Abortion Inc | $50,000 |
| Cross International Inc | $50,000 |
| Star Gospel Mission | $50,000 |
| Friends of Tenwek | $50,000 |
| Hope of Life International | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $511k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DNDISCIPLESHIP NETWORK OF AMERICA4× · 2021–2024 · $275k · revenue +55%
- CCCITY COMMIT INC3× · 2021–2024 · $211k · revenue +41% · 34% of their budget
- PSPREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC3× · 2021–2023 · $178k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- PHPATRICK HENRY COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +3%
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOMone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +15%- SGSAVING GRACE BIBLE CHURCH INCone grant, 2023 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
To teach individuals how to apply the wisdom and depth of the bible's grace-centered message to the problems of daily living; and through various means, work to restore chirst to counseling and christ-centered counseling to the church.
Ftlm seeks to equip churches to minister to those who are suffering from addiction and equip christians with the resources needed to facilitate spiritual growth in christlike character and biblical wisdom.
Biblical counseling
Fireproof Ministries exists to bring people to the Lord as well as train and develop people to meet the unmet needs of the world through culturally relevant programs and ideas.
Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…
International Biblical Training is a teaching, training and equipping religious ministry. IBT staff provide theological teaching and training for the purpose of making Christian disciples who in turn train and disciple others in…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…
Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star Gospel Mission and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds National Christian Foundation Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CITY COMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds GALATIANS 62 INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF KNOXVILLE ↗
- Who funds PINE VALLEY BIBLE CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Support After Abortion Inc ↗
- Who funds HARVEST PREPARATION INTL INC ↗
- Who funds Nation 2 Nation ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CUTTING EDGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL DISCIPLES ↗
- Who funds A DOOR OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TENWEK INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL TEAM ADVOCATES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Hearts Afire Inc ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds STAR GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds EPCA INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER TOGETHER STRENGTHENING FAMILES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ROCKET PHONICS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Truly Valued Inc ↗
- Who funds SUNCOAST YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
- Who funds Apartment Life Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Cross International Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc · Center for Faith and Freedom Inc · Servant Foundation · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Miller Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc · The Libertore Fund for Children Inc · Sisterhood For Good Inc · Msc Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Selah Freedom Inc — 53% of income from government
- Purpose House Ministries Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.