How much did CENTER FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM INC grant in FY2025?

International$751kHuman Services$196kHealth$50kYouth Development$45kReligion$40kHousing & Shelter$25kPhilanthropy$15kEnvironment$10kAnimals$10kOther$751k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

non-profit organizationsupportorganizationsupport humanitarian

2023

non-profit organizationsupportorganizationsupport humanitarian

2024

non-profit organizationsupportorganizationsupport humanitarian

2025

non-profit organizationsupportorganizationsupport humanitarian

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k14 grants · $142k
$50k–250k1 grant · $144k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

ISRAEL TEAM ADVOCATES INTERNATIONAL$144,000
A FEARLESS LIFE$12,000
NIGHT WITH THE STARS PROM INC$10,000
BRADEN RIVER AVID$10,000
LIBERTY MANOR$10,000
UNDERDOG RESCUE OF FLORIDA$10,000
THE ANGELUS$10,000
GRACE RECOVERY HOUSE$10,000
JOSH PROVIDES$10,000
ST MARY'S KIDS$10,000
ON THE SPOT AID$10,000
SUNCOAST STARS COMMUNITY$10,000
HARBOR 58 MINISTIRES$10,000
BEDS FOR KIDS$10,000
CARING K9S$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of CENTER FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

CENTER FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 15 repeat orgs$891k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

110

Total granted

$1.0M

$781k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%

+87%

Still filing today

60%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BF
BEDS FOR KIDS
2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%
SECOND HEART HOMES
2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +837%
HU
HAND UP TO VICTORY
2× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +194%

Funded once

WC
WESTCOAST CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
one grant, 2019 · $13k
AF
ANGLING FOR RELIEF
one grant, 2022 · $10k
JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTAMANATEE
one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Saved 2 Serve Inc

Our mission is to partner with ordinary people to go and do extraordinary things in the name of Jesus so that all might see, hear and experience God's love in tangible ways. We are a nonprofit organization spreading hope and the love of…

Human Services

Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals

Our Peaceful Living Inc

Promote Independence and improve quality of life for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Provides community Outreach and Group Home Services to the Sarasota, FL Area.

Human Services

Florida Resurrection House Inc

To provide shelter for families in need and to create an environment providing, time, space and support services which enable homeless families to rebuild their lives. families typically stay one to three years with low turnover. the goal…

Housing & Shelter

Hope for Her Florida Inc

At Hope for Her, our mission is to provide a safe place where women experiencing crisis or trauma find the strength, skills and support they need to rebuild their best lives.

Crime & Legal

Lamp of Hope Ministry Inc

Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…

Human Services

Shelter Providers of Orlando Inc

Homeaid's mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement and education.

—

Hollys Hope of North Port Incorporated

Education

Recovery House of Central Florida I

Provide emergency shelter, transitional housing, and recovery support services to homeless men with substance abuse issues through faith-based programming. to promote abstinence from drugs and alcohol through a curriculum of education,…

Health

Pathways to Care Inc

Pathways to care is dedicated to providing health, housing and hope to central florida's homeless.

Health

Hope At Hand Inc

Hope at Hand is a 501(C)(3) that provides poetry therapy for at-risk youth.Using creativity, language, art and therapeutic approaches, we facilitate healing and personal growth to struggling and vulnerable youth populations with limited…

Education

Re Entry One Inc

Provides reentry programs for individual

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Purpose House Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hand Up to Victory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/68

the rest of the field

14%

2,263/15,930

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

58 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

55/58

Grantees still filing

47/58

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International$751,000Other$785,576Human Services$196,000Health$50,000Youth Development$45,000Religion$40,000Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota CoFL84.2× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer · William G and Marie Selby · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation · The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz · Sisterhood For Good Inc · Joan Armour Mendell Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CENTER FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

13get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ISRAEL TEAM ADVOCATES INTERNATIONAL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 611799765 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ISRAEL TEAM ADVOCATES INTERNATIONAL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 62% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Center for Faith and Freedom Inc?

Find your warmest path to Center for Faith and Freedom Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CENTER FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

58 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Center for Faith and Freedom Inc?

More from the funding graph

CENTER FOR FAITH AND FREEDOM INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

58 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Center for Faith and Freedom Inc?

More from the funding graph