Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bilby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$451kHuman Services$291kHealth$188kPublic Safety & Disaster$176kAnimals$41kArts & Culture$38kHousing & Shelter$22kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Children's Shelter & Family Services$90,000
Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service$50,000
Ashley Inc$32,000
Univ of Oklahoma Foundation$25,000
Ranch Hand Rescue$15,000
Univ of Oklahoma Foundation$8,000
Texas Tech Foundation$7,000
Ardmore Animal Shelter$4,000
Texas Christian University$3,000
Panhandle State University$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Ranch Hand Rescue: $15k → 8%Panhandle State University: $5k → 13%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $45k → 13%Community Children's Shelter & Family Services: $90k → 16%The Homeless Alliance Inc: $12k → 16%Valley Hope Assocation: $24k → 16%Gunnison Counsel for the Arts: $25k → 10%Little Hill Foundation: $29k → 7%Ashley Inc: $32k → 7%Ranch Hand Rescue: $12k → 8%Panhandle State University: $4k → 13%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $42k → 13%Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service: $70k → 16%The Homeless Alliance Inc: $10k → 16%Valley Hope Assocation: $20k → 16%Gunnison Counsel for the Arts: $13k → 10%Ashley Inc: $25k → 7%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $40k → 13%Community Children's Shelter & Family Services: $64k → 16%Valley Hope Assocation: $15k → 16%Gunnison Valley Health Foundation: $10k → 10%Ashley Inc: $25k → 7%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $40k → 13%Community Children's Shelter & Family Services: $55k → 16%Valley Hope Assocation: $12k → 16%Ashley Inc: $5k → 7%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $37k → 13%Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service: $50k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $27k → 13%Community Children's Shelter & Family Services: $36k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $25k → 13%Community Children's Shelter & Family Services: $25k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $25k → 13%Community Children's Shelter & Family Services: $22k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $25k → 13%Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service: $20k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $25k → 13%Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service: $15k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $25k → 13%Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service: $15k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $20k → 13%Oak Hall Episcopal School: $10k → 16%Univ of Oklahoma Foundation: $8k → 13%Arbuckle Life Solutions: $10k → 16%Southern Oklahoma Ambulance Service: $6k → 16%Arbuckle Life Solutions: $6k → 16%First Presbyterian Church: $5k → 16%Arbuckle Life Solutions: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+81%

Still filing today

64%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $176k · revenue +113%
  • AI
    ASHLEY INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $87k · revenue +34%
  • VH
    Valley Hope Association
    4× · 2021–2024 · $71k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • LH
    Little Hill Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • GV
    GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • OH
    OAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
2
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
7
Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center Inc

To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.

Health
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Ivinson Memorial Hospital

Trusted partners in world-class healthcare. building trust with our patients and with each other.

Health
10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
The Howard University

The howard university was established by an act of congress in 1867. the university is an institution that educates students, develops professionals, conducts research, and serves patients through 12 schools of higher education and an…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Hope Association and the most unlike its peers is Ranch Hands Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Community Children's Shelter & Family Services — $290,500 · OtherCommunity Children's Shelter & Family S…Gunnison Counsel for the Arts — $37,500 · OtherGunnison Counsel for the ArtsLittle Hill Foundation — $29,000 · OtherLittle Hill FoundationARBUCKLE LIFE SOLUTIONS INC — $20,500 · OtherPanhandle State University — $17,000 · Other+4 more — $25,500 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $384,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION IN…+2 more — $10,000 · EducationSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $175,500 · HealthSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA AMBULANCE SERV…ASHLEY INC — $87,000 · HealthASHLEY INCValley Hope Association — $70,500 · HealthValley Hope Association+1 more — $10,000 · HealthRanch Hands Rescue — $31,000 · AnimalsTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $21,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$420,000Education$394,000Health$343,000Animals$31,000Housing & Shelter$21,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $384,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $175,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetASHLEY INC — $87,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetValley Hope Association — $70,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRanch Hands Rescue — $31,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARBUCKLE LIFE SOLUTIONS INC — $20,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
  • Who funds ASHLEY INC
  • Who funds Valley Hope Association
  • Who funds Ranch Hands Rescue
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds ARBUCKLE LIFE SOLUTIONS INC
  • Who funds GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Samuel Roberts Noble FoundationOK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · Charles B Goddard Foundation Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bilby Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bilby Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bilby Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph