· Private foundation
The Betty T and David M Schneider Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of THE BETTY T AND DAVID M SCHNEIDER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $255k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS | $150,000 |
| FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER | $55,000 |
| BUCKLEY INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY SCHOOL | $25,300 |
| FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS | $25,000 |
| KEY BISCAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA | $15,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $10,500 |
| CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $10,000 |
| GICIA | $10,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $6,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY | $5,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION (FIRE) | $3,000 |
| PRETERM | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2019–2024 · $225k · revenue +117%- CMCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART5× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +71%
- BIBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $112k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- MMMAINE MARITIME ACADEMYone grant, 2024 · $25k
- RDRYON D PROVENCHER MEMORIAL FUNDone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0% · 26% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Johann Fust Library Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds BUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WAITE HILL VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds GASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL ↗
- Who funds KEY BISCAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL INSURRECTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Emmanuel Promise of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHANN FUST LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RYON D PROVENCHER MEMORIAL FUND ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Jane and Jon Outcalt Foundation · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · The Lozick Family Foundation · The Rig III Family Foundation · A Malachi Mixon III & Barbara W Mixon Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · John P Murphy Foundation · Triad Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · The Kelvin & Eleanor Smith Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Betty T and David M Schneider Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.