Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bert & Sandra Wasserman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$429k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$230k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.6MHealth$851kPhilanthropy$417kArts & Culture$311kReligion$231kHuman Services$67kMembership Benefit$40kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $306k
$17,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$230,000
PROJECT ALS INC$76,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$25,000
KINDNESSORG$25,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$20,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA HOUSE$17,500
THE JEWISH MUSEUM$10,000
BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$10,000
DWIGHT ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL$8,650
CONGREGATION RODEPH SHOLOM$5,400
DOROT$1,018
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JCC OF MANHATTAN: $125k → 17%JCC OF MANHATTAN: $25k → 17%JCC OF MANHATTAN: $25k → 17%JCC OF MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%KINDNESSORG: $25k → 17%KINDNESSORG: $25k → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 22 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$3.5M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+37%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $417k · revenue +39%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +88% · 47% of their budget
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    3× · 2018–2020 · $197k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • T
    THIRTEEN
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • PK
    Project Keshergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +181%
  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
8
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
9
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
10
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc

Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…

Religion
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $1,200,000 · EducationTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND+4 more: $75,250 · Education+4 moreBARUCH COLLEGE: $370,000 · OtherBARUCH COLLEGEUniversity of Michigan: $250,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMETROPOLITAN OPERA HOUSE: $110,330 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERA HOUSEBOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $70,000 · OtherBOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITALTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $62,500 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERAGURWIN JEWISH NURSING & REHAB CTR: $40,000 · Other+9 more: $83,450 · Other+9 morePROJECT ALS INC: $283,322 · HealthPROJECT ALS INCMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $197,389 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $417,300 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH…THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $185,000 · Human ServicesKINDNESSORG INC: $50,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,818 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $70,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,030 · Arts & CultureTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $50,000 · Membership BenefitWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $500 · Religion
Education$1,275,250Other$986,280Health$480,711Philanthropy$417,300Human Services$241,818Arts & Culture$139,030Membership Benefit$50,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $1,200,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $417,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC: $283,322 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $250,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $197,389 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $185,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKINDNESSORG INC: $50,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetEmory University: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $21,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetProject Kesher: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL: $8,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $6,818 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,530 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ALS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds KINDNESSORG INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
  • Who funds Project Kesher ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEFA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bert & Sandra Wasserman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bert & Sandra Wasserman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bert & Sandra Wasserman Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Bert & Sandra Wasserman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bert & Sandra Wasserman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph