Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bergman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$229kReligion$145kAnimals$50kScience & Tech$43kSocial Science$10kFood & Nutrition$9kEducation$225
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,578
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE CHICAGO CHURCH$50,000
A ESCOBAR$10,000
MARWEN FOUNDATION$10,000
ARTS OF LIFE$10,000
UNITING VOICES$10,000
NOVO MISSION INC$5,000
SHED NYC INC$5,000
A DEFEO$2,578
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$2,500
INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP$2,500
PILOT LIGHT$2,500
ASSOCIATION OF WRITERS & WRITING$870
POETS HOUSE INC$600
NATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION INC$405
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW$225
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NOVO MISSION INC: $30k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $25k → 17%ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $10k → 20%UNITING VOICES: $25k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF WRITERS & WRITING: $870 → 19%NOVO MISSION INC: $30k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $25k → 17%CHICAGO CHILDRENS CHOIR: $15k → 14%NOVO MISSION INC: $30k → 10%THE POETRY PROJECT LIMITED: $25k → 17%UNITING VOICES: $10k → 14%NOVO MISSION INC: $5k → 10%SHED NYC INC: $5k → 17%UNITING VOICES: $10k → 14%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW: $225 → 17%ARTS OF LIFE: $25k → 14%POETRY SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $60 → 17%ARTS OF LIFE: $10k → 14%NATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION INC: $405 → 17%ARTS OF LIFE: $10k → 14%POETS HOUSE INC: $600 → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $6k → 14%ARTS OF LIFE: $10k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $5k → 14%PILOT LIGHT: $6k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $6k → 14%INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $3k → 14%PILOT LIGHT: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%MARWEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MARWEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MARWEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 8 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$341k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+2694%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UV
    UNITING VOICES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +43%
  • TA
    THE ARTS OF LIFE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +87%
  • MF
    Marwen Foundation Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE POETRY PROJECT LTDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue ×28
  • RI
    ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • LN
    L Newbern
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Poetry Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
National Poetry Series Inc
—
3
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
4
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
5
Arts Letters and Numbers
Arts & Culture
6
Poets and Writers Inc

To foster the professional development of poets and writers, to promote communication throughout the literary community, and to help create an environment in which literature can be appreciated by the widest possible public.

Arts & Culture
7
Literary Freedom Project Inc

The Literary Freedom Project creates free, open spaces for communities to engage with books through weekly discussions and presentations. Our programs promote literacy, celebrate the diverse cultures of the Bronx and NYC, and foster…

Arts & Culture
8
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
9
Artists Book House Nfp

Founded by former faculty, staff, and alumni of the columbia college chicago center for book and paper arts, the organizations purpose is to create a new home in chicagoland where artists, writers, readers, and other thoughtful people can…

Arts & Culture
10
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
11
The Black Literacy and Arts Collaborative Project
—
12
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Poets House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Intonation Music Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOVO MISSION INC: $95,000 · OtherNOVO MISSION INCNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INCGRACE CHICAGO CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherGRACE CHICAGO CHURCHTHE POETRY PROJECT LTD: $25,000 · OtherTHE POETRY PROJECT LTDL Newbern: $10,000 · OtherJ Seo: $10,000 · OtherZ Hitzig: $10,000 · OtherA ESCOBAR: $10,000 · OtherR Mannheimer: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $3,208 · OtherUNITING VOICES: $60,000 · Arts & CultureUNITING VOICESTHE ARTS OF LIFE INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS OF LIFE INCMarwen Foundation Inc: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMarwen Foundation IncINTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $13,500 · Arts & CultureINTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOPROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC+4 more: $6,530 · Arts & CultureTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $28,500 · EducationPILOT LIGHT: $8,500 · Health
Other$273,208Arts & Culture$175,030Education$28,500Health$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITING VOICES: $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARTS OF LIFE INC: $55,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMarwen Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $28,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POETRY PROJECT LTD: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetINTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP: $13,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPILOT LIGHT: $8,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSHED NYC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF WRITERS & WRITING PROGRAMS: $870 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETS HOUSE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION INC: $405 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETRY SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Marwen Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE POETRY PROJECT LTD ↗
  • Who funds INTONATION MUSIC WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PILOT LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds SHED NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF WRITERS & WRITING PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds POETS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POETRY SOCIETY OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Poetry FoundationIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Poetry Foundation · The Academy of American Poets Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bergman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bergman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bergman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph