Skip to content
The Benharush Family A NJ Nonprofit Corporation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Benharush Family A NJ Nonprofit Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$6kHealth$3kEducation$2kInternational$1kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$250Community Improvement$107Other$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $6,159, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,474 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,315 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$275
Median grant
3
States reached
$241k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Israel of Teaneck$1,184
Project Yechi$1,000
Chabad House Lubavitch Inc$600
American Friends of Kupat Hair$500
Young Israel of Teaneck$412
Chabad House Lubavitch Inc$400
Project Yechi$360
Ann Arbor Orthodox Minyan$360
Michigan University$275
Young Israel of Teaneck$246
Project Ezra$200
Chabad House Lubavitch Inc$200
Young Israel of Teaneck$186
Achdut Israel Synague- Chabad$81
Sephardic center Fair Lawn$50
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8k · 3 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$8k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+45%

Still filing today

33%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’24
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL
    3× · 2019–2024 · $4k
  • PY
    PROJECT YECHI INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +37%
  • AA
    ANN ARBOR ORTHODOX MINYAN
    2× · 2022–2024 · $542

Funded once

  • YA
    YAVNEH ACADEMY & TALMUD TORAH OF PATERSON
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • TF
    The Frisch School
    one grant, 2022 · $850 · revenue +10%
  • JN
    JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $800
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $4,178 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELCHABAD HOUSE - LUBAVITCH INC: $1,200 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE - LUBAVITCH INCYAVNEH ACADEMY & TALMUD TORAH OF PATERSON: $1,190 · OtherYAVNEH ACADEMY & TALMUD TORAH OF PATERSONANN ARBOR ORTHODOX MINYAN: $542 · OtherANN ARBOR ORTHODOX MINYANMichigan University: $275 · Other+10 more: $856 · Other+10 morePROJECT YECHI INC: $2,900 · HealthPROJECT YECHI INCProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $790 · PhilanthropyJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $250 · PhilanthropyThe Frisch School: $850 · EducationJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $800 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $500 · ReligionOORAH INC: $480 · Human Services
Other$8,241Health$2,900Philanthropy$1,040Education$850International$800Religion$500Human Services$480

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT YECHI INC: $2,900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Frisch School: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT YECHI INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frisch School ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
  • Who funds OORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundFjcThe Kahan Family Foun…George and Ellen Frie…Jewish Federation of …The Ojc FundThe Blumenfeld Family…The Arthur & Joyce Fe…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…
Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Kahan Family Foundation · George and Ellen Friedman Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $11k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Benharush Family A NJ Nonprofit’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home