Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bengier Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$695k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$1.5MEducation$742kEmployment$560kInternational$422kHuman Services$70kHealth$60kYouth Development$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $335k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Exploratorium$250,000
Global Citizen Year$125,000
Summer Search$100,000
The University Corporation San Francisco State$60,000
Santa Fe Institute$50,000
UCSF MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY$25,000
Global Glimpse$20,000
AIM High$15,000
SMART Program$15,000
Mercy High School Burlingame$15,000
Boys and Girls Clubs of San Francisco$10,000
Bay Scholars$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AIM High: $15k → 9%AIM High: $15k → 9%AIM High: $10k → 9%AIM High: $15k → 10%AIM High: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 16 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$3.3M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-5%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureEmploymentScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SANTA FE INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $270k · revenue +402%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $270k · revenue +10%
  • GG
    Global Glimpse
    6× · 2019–2024 · $102k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • BC
    BOSTON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • SF
    SFSU Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $45k
  • SM
    SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
3
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
6
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
7
Urban School of San Francisco

The urban school of san francisco seeks to ignite a passion for learning, inspiring its students to become self-motivated, enthusiastic participants in their education - both in high school and beyond.

Education
8
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
9
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
10
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
11
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
12
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Schools Mentoring and Resources Team Inc (Smart); the most unlike its peers is Aim High. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EXPLORATORIUM: $1,250,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUMSUMMER SEARCH: $530,000 · EmploymentSUMMER SEARCHTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $270,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY …Global Glimpse: $102,000 · EducationGlobal GlimpseBAY SCHOLARS: $50,000 · EducationBAY SCHOLARSTHE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 · EducationTHE BAY SCHOOL …+2 more: $20,000 · EducationBOSTON COLLEGE: $125,000 · OtherBOSTON COLLEG…Mercy High School Burlingame: $80,000 · OtherMercy High Sc…UCSF Medical Center Auxiliary: $50,000 · OtherUCSF Medical …SFSU Foundation: $45,000 · OtherSFSU Foundati…SMART PROGRAM: $40,000 · OtherSMART PROGRAMSMART Program: $35,000 · OtherSMART ProgramGENESYS WORKS: $30,000 · OtherGENESYS WORKSMERCY HIGH SCHOOL SAN FRANCISCO: $20,000 · OtherTilting Futures Incorporated: $417,000 · InternationalTilting Futur…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $270,000 · Science & TechAIM HIGH: $70,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $55,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$1,250,000Employment$530,000Education$482,000Other$425,000International$422,000Science & Tech$270,000Human Services$70,000Youth Development$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $1,250,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $530,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTilting Futures Incorporated: $417,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $270,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $270,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGlobal Glimpse: $102,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetAIM HIGH: $70,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAY SCHOLARS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART): $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BAY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Tilting Futures Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
  • Who funds Global Glimpse ↗
  • Who funds AIM HIGH ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds BAY SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds UCSF Medical Center Auxiliary ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bengier Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bengier Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bengier’s filings →

    More from the funding graph