Skip to content

California · Public charity

The Baum Foundation

The mission of The Baum Foundation is to improve the quality of people's lives by supporting programs in the arts, education and the environment.

$38k
Granted FY2019
2
Itemized grants FY2019
2
Organizations funded FY2019
50%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$36k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$25,816
Largest grant, FY2019
$25,816
Organizations funded a year
2 to 10
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
2

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 50% of the organizations The Baum Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 72% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EnvironmentScience & TechCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20192$36k50%
FY20186$190k100%
FY201710$269kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Environment$422kCommunity Improvement$19kSocial Science$17kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$10kScience & Tech$10kFood & Nutrition$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of The Baum Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Oceanelders Inc$127,0001n/a
Sylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue$100,00016%
Eyak Preservation Council dba Cultural Defense Fund$50,000121%
Ocean Doctor Inc$30,032113%
Green Forests Work Inc$30,00019%
Native Conservancy$25,816110%
Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated$25,00010%
The Hydrous$18,60017%
The Aspen Institute Inc$16,60020%
The Exploratorium$10,00010%
Rocky Mountain Institute$10,00010%
The 5 Gyres Institute$10,00011%
Aspen Valley Ski-Snowboard Cl$10,0001n/a
Aspen Art Museum$10,00010%
Big Green$8,0001n/a
Aspen Center for Environmental Studies$7,20010%
Oceanic Society Expeditions$6,79010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Baum Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue: $100,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetEyak Preservation Council dba Cultural Defense Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetOcean Doctor Inc: $30,032 over 1y, 13% of budgetGreen Forests Work Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetNative Conservancy: $25,816 over 1y, 10% of budgetEnvironmental Defense Fund Incorporated: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hydrous: $18,600 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetThe Aspen Institute Inc: $16,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Exploratorium: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe 5 Gyres Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAspen Art Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Center for Environmental Studies: $7,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOceanic Society Expeditions: $6,790 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Baum Foundation with peer funders

About The Baum Foundation

How much does The Baum Foundation give?
The Baum Foundation reported 2 itemized grants totaling $35,816, out of $37,516 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Baum Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Environment (85%), Community Improvement (4%), Social Science (3%).
Who are The Baum Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Oceanelders Inc ($127k), Sylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue ($100k), Eyak Preservation Council dba Cultural Defense Fund ($50k).
Does The Baum Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Baum Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Silicon Valley Community Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is The Baum Foundation based?
The Baum Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Baum’s filings →

More from the funding graph