Skip to content
The Baudoin Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Baudoin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$76kHealth$68kInternational$60kHousing & Shelter$51kHuman Services$44kCivil Rights$10kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THANKS TO SCANDINAVIA$10,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS$10,000
ON THE RISE INC$10,000
GREATER DC DIAPER BANK$10,000
CAN DO MS$10,000
PROJECT DRAWDOWN$5,000
JUST A START$5,000
MANNA FOOD CENTER$5,000
ARTS FOR THE AGING$5,000
FOOD FOR FREE$5,000
FRIENDS OF NYC NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ON THE RISE INC: $10k → 8%ON THE RISE INC: $10k → 8%ON THE RISE INC: $10k → 8%ON THE RISE INC: $10k → 8%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $10k → 8%ON THE RISE INC: $6k → 8%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $10k → 8%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $8k → 8%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 9 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$279k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+114%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthInternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    ON THE RISE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $46k · revenue +43%
  • TT
    THANKS TO SCANDINAVIA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +19%
  • GREATER DC DIAPER BANK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • HO
    HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
7
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
8
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Full Frame Initiative Inc

Moving the united states towards a country where everyone has a fair shot at wellbeing.

—
10
Fos Feminista Fund

Fos feminista fund was formed exclusively for charitable purposes to support, foster, aid, and enhance access to contraception, responsible parenthood, reproductive health, and empowerment of women and shall aid and support the activities…

Health
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Drawdown. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THANKS TO SCANDINAVIA INC: $40,000 · OtherTHANKS TO SCANDINAVIA INCIndividual grant recipient: $36,213 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $30,000 · OtherCan Do Multiple SclerosisINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS: $30,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGH…+4 more: $18,057 · Other+4 moreON THE RISE INC: $46,391 · Human ServicesON THE RISE INCGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $33,743 · Human ServicesGREATER DC DIAPER BANKWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE: $30,000 · HealthWHOLE WOMA…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsARTS FOR THE AGING INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,270Human Services$80,134Health$30,000International$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Civil Rights$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetON THE RISE INC: $46,391 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHANKS TO SCANDINAVIA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $33,743 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTS FOR THE AGING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Baudoin Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Baudoin Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • On the Rise Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Just-a-Start Corporation: 16% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Arts for the Aging Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Baudoin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home