Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$157kHealth$79kHuman Services$67kArts & Culture$39kYouth Development$29kFood & Nutrition$20kHousing & Shelter$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$976k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC$36,000
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$5,500
MARK ARTS$5,000
HEARTSPRING$4,000
WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$4,000
SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES$3,000
CHILDREN 1ST$2,500
EMPOWERED (YOUTH ENTREPRENEURS OF KANSAS)$2,500
CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,500
KANSAS FOOD BANK$2,000
THE LORD'S DINER$2,000
WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION$2,000
UJUMP INC$2,000
WICHITA SEDGWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM$1,500
UNION RESCUE MISSION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 24 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$381k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+52%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +43%
  • MA
    MARK ARTS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +70%
  • HI
    HEARTSPRING INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • NM
    NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SR
    SOUTH ROCK CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100
  • TC
    Tabor Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100 · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
2
Kansas Humane Society of Wichita Kansas

The kansas humane society is a community resource for pets and people, dedicated to enhancing the welfare of all companion animals.

Animals
3
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
4
Wichita Area Sexual Assault Center Inc

Wichita area sexual assault center works with individuals and communities through comprehensive services and education to create a culture of intolerance for sexual violence and an atmosphere of healing for those impacted by it.

Health
5
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
6
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
7
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
8
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
9
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
10
Wichita Christian School Inc

The mission of Wichita Christian School is to provide a quality education in a Christian environment that inspires hearts, minds, and souls for successful living.

Education
11
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
12
Kansas Land Trust Inc

To protect and preserve lands of natural, ecological, scenic, historic, agricultural, or recreational significance in kansas.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ujump Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WSU FOUNDATION: $129,000 · OtherWSU FOUNDATIONHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $36,000 · OtherHUNTER HEALTH CLINICCEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherCEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATIONSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $14,500 · OtherKANSAS BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS: $13,000 · OtherCHILDREN 1ST: $10,000 · OtherTHE LORD'S DINER: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $50,100 · Other+12 moreMARK ARTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMARK ARTS…WICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · Arts & CultureWICHITA-S…KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS PU…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $35,500 · Human ServicesTHE WICHI…WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $7,500 · EducationWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationHEARTSPRING INC: $24,000 · HealthKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $9,000 · Religion
Other$277,600Arts & Culture$36,500Human Services$35,500Education$29,600Health$24,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Religion$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $35,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTSPRING INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUJUMP INC: $8,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWe Treat Kids Right: $5,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA ANIMAL ACTION LEAGUE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTabor College: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds UJUMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Entrepreneurs Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA-SEDGWICK COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds We Treat Kids Right ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA ANIMAL ACTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Tabor College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353RI28.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Ima Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Wichita Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · United Way of the Plains Inc · Mosby Lincoln Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph