Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barry Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$136kEducation$114kHuman Services$106kReligion$35kYouth Development$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brother Rice High School - Mt Sion$18,000
Tinely Park Food Pantry$8,000
Weishar Foundation$8,000
St John Fisher School$5,000
Solace Home$4,000
St Catherine Church - Vincent DePaul Society$4,000
St Catherine Church - Vincent DePaul Society$3,000
Pat Mack's Pack Foundation$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Solace Friends: $5k → 10%The Mulliganeers: $8k → 7%Solace Friends: $4k → 10%Mulliganeers: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The Barry Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 72%.

The Barry Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$337k · 13 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
25

Total granted

$337k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-37%

Still filing today

23%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $43k · revenue +72%
  • MI
    MULLIGANEERS INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue +48%
  • SF
    Solace Friends Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $9k · revenue +419%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Society of St Vincent de Paul
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • SB
    ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -37%
  • IF
    Inst for Diaconal Program Archdiocese of Chicago Scholarship Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The WILLstrong Foundation Trust

The WillStrong Cancer Foundation is dedicated to providing financial support for research to bring more precise and effective treatments to children and young adults diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other high-risk leukemia.

—
2
Margaux's Miracle Foundation Inc

The organization provides funds to assist in children's cancer research.

Health
3
Mulligans Fore Kids Inc

Raising funds to provide financial assistance to children who are in need of medical care.

Philanthropy
4
Matchingdonorsorg Inc

The organization finds living altruistic organ donors for patients needing transplants it is a source for patients and recommended and used by doctors across the united states.

Health
5
FUNraisers for St Jude Inc

Our hope is to raise enough money that one day childhood cancer is a distant memory

Human Services
6
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
7
Friends of Kids With Cancer

Friends of kids with cancer is devoted to enriching the daily lives of children undergoing treatment for, and survivors of, cancer and blood-related diseases....(see schedule o)our mission is to be an advocate for these special kids…

Human Services
8
Trial Blazers for Kids Inc

Improving treatment options and finding cures for pediatric cancer by funding innovative clinical trials through public donations

Health
9
Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inc

To lead and mobilize resources toward effective management, treatment and ultimately a cure for myotonic dystrophy through education, advocacy and research.

Health
10
Ross K Macneill Foundation

End pediatric brain cancer by raising money for research and raising awareness for the diagnosis. our research investments focus on innovative non-toxic therapy development for children.

—
11
Donor Support Foundation Inc

Donor Support Foundation aims to aid living organ donors through financial aide housing assistance education aftercare and advocacy

Health
12
The Maddie Kramer Foundation d/b/a Dancing While Cancering

To bring joy to the hospital experience for children with cancer and to provide related charitable assistance

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kevin Dowling Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Brother Rice High School Student Fund: $96,000 · OtherBrother Rice High School Student FundIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPat Mack's Pack Foundation: $37,000 · OtherPat Mack's Pack FoundationSt Julie Billiart Catholic Church (IL) - Chapter St Vincent DePaul: $20,000 · OtherBrother Rice High School - Mt Sion: $18,000 · OtherSt Catherine Catholic Parish (Oak Lawn IL) - Chapter St Vincent DePaul: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · Other+30 more: $129,350 · Other+30 moreTHE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION: $43,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ANDREW W…ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'…MULLIGANEERS INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSolace Friends Inc: $9,000 · Human ServicesMADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Education
Other$387,350Philanthropy$50,500Human Services$21,500Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMULLIGANEERS INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSolace Friends Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT ST JOSEPH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAK LAWN BASEBALL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEVIN DOWLING SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $300 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ANDREW WEISHAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MULLIGANEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Solace Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ST JOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds MADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK LAWN BASEBALL ↗
  • Who funds KEVIN DOWLING SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barry Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barry Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barry Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph