Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Barrington Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$560kPublic Benefit$345kHousing & Shelter$320kEducation$295kHealth$113kReligion$70kPhilanthropy$40kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATO INSTITUTE$40,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%WISE: $30k → 10%HOPE SOUTH FLORIDA: $40k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 10 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+29%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitHealthEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $345k · revenue +70%
  • SC
    SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +33%
  • HS
    HOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FOR HAITI INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -15%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The House of Hope Inc

House of hope's mission is to provide the tools to achieve recovery from addiction and address mental health issues while transforming lives, families and communities. house of hope provides hope for the future and healing to those in need…

Health
2
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
3
Centerstone of Florida Inc

Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"

Health
4
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
5
The Children's Home Society of Florida

Children's home society of florida mission statement:building bridges to success for children

Human Services
6
Broward House Inc

Mission the mission of broward house is to improve the quality of life for individuals impacted with chronic health challenges, including hiv, by providing pathways to wellness. vision providing hope and healing to our communities,

Human Services
7
Ability Housing Inc

The mission of ability housing is to build flourishing communities where everyone has a home. its vision is a society where housing is a right, not a privilege; and all individuals have safe, affordable housing in vibrant communities. it…

Health
8
Sco Family of Services

Sco family of services works with new york's most vulnerable - those striving to overcome the devastating impact of poverty, neglect, abuse or developmental and mental challenges. we respond to moments of crisis and prevent crises before…

Human Services
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc

Our mission is a seamless, accessible, recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care driven by consumers, providers, and other stakeholders, in which innovation and collaboration are the norm and diversified financial resources…

Health
11
Camelot Community Care Inc

To develop and provide services that enable children and families to realize their fullest potential.

Human Services
12
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is Susan B Anthony Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $320,000 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCDARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK FOUNDATION: $255,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK FOUNDATIONSUSAN B ANTHONY CENTER INC: $80,000 · OtherSUSAN B ANTHONY CENTER INCAKILAH FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherAKILAH FOUNDATION+1 more: $20,000 · OtherHOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INCWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC: $240,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) …CATO INSTITUTE: $345,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTESTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $33,000 · HealthHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $25,000 · InternationalBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$745,000Human Services$560,000Public Benefit$345,000Education$40,000Philanthropy$40,000Health$33,000International$25,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $345,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $320,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $320,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC: $240,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY CENTER INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barrington Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barrington Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barrington’s filings →

More from the funding graph