Skip to content
The Barberio Family Foundation Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

The Barberio Family Foundation Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0164% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$293kPhilanthropy$39kHealth$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kReligion$12kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$8kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATRICIA ALLEN FUND$17,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$10,000
NET POSITIVE-THE FOUNDRY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE TEACHERS DESK$5,000
100 CLUB OF BUFFALO$2,650
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LUMININA DBA HOPE CHEST$1,000
WNY MUSSOMELESE SOCIETY$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
THE RIDE FOR ROSWELL$1,000
ST LUKES MISSION OF MERCY$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
GLOBAL HEALTH VOLUNTEERS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%THE TEACHERS DESK: $5k → 13%NET POSITIVE: $3k → 13%NET POSITIVE: $2k → 13%NET POSITIVE: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
MD
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$453k · 27 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
27

Total granted

$453k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-19%

Still filing today

41%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    5× · 2020–2024 · $210k · revenue +38%
  • 1C
    100 CLUB OF BUFFALO INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +21%
  • NP
    Net Positive Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +514%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S COLLIGATE INSTITUE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • RP
    ROSEWELL PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
9
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Legion George F Lamm Post No 622. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PETER & PAUL SCHOOL: $31,500 · OtherST PETER & PAUL SCHOOLPATRICIA ALLEN FUND: $17,000 · OtherPATRICIA ALLEN FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient100 CLUB OF BUFFALO INC: $14,400 · Other100 CLUB OF BUFFALO INCIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOSEPH'S COLLIGATE INSTITUE: $10,000 · OtherNET POSITIVE-THE FOUNDRY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherKIA: $7,500 · Other+35 more: $59,100 · Other+35 moreRochester Institute of Technology: $210,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology+2 more: $2,500 · EducationTHE TEACHERS DESK INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEACHE…Net Positive Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesNet Positi…ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $13,200 · PhilanthropyTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC: $6,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyLUMININA CORP: $3,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthUpstate Venture Connect Corporation: $2,000 · Community ImprovementWESTERN NEW YORK PUBLIC BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$221,000Education$212,500Human Services$45,000Philanthropy$19,950Health$6,100Community Improvement$2,000Arts & Culture$2,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $210,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEACHERS DESK INC: $40,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budget100 CLUB OF BUFFALO INC: $14,400 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNet Positive Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLUMININA CORP: $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUpstate Venture Connect Corporation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BEECHWOODBLOCHER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN NEW YORK PUBLIC BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION GEORGE F LAMM POST NO 622: $500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCoastal Christian High School Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds THE TEACHERS DESK INC ↗
  • Who funds 100 CLUB OF BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE 11 DAY POWER PLAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Net Positive Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUMININA CORP ↗
  • Who funds Upstate Venture Connect Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE BEECHWOODBLOCHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN NEW YORK PUBLIC BROADCASTING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Barberio Family Foundation Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Barberio Family Foundation Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barberio Family Foundation Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home