Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Barbara Brodsky Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$9.1MHuman Services$2.3MInternational$1.8MPhilanthropy$399kAnimals$130kPublic Benefit$90kScience & Tech$35kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $100
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$750,000
MAIN LINE HEALTH$250,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JFCS: $635k → 22%JFCS: $402k → 22%JFCS: $392k → 22%JFCS: $366k → 22%JFCS: $247k → 22%JFCS: $219k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 15 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$13M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+18%

Still filing today

73%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $6.1M · revenue +26%
  • TB
    THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +101%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.3M · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAUNDERS HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • PC
    PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATIC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • P
    PCOM
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Main Line Hospitals Inc

The mission of main line hospitals, inc. is to provide a comprehensive range of safe, high quality health services, complemented by educational and research activities that meet healthcare needs and improve the quality of life in the…

Health
2
Paoli Memorial Hospital Foundation

Provides fundraising and development activities to support main line hospitals, inc. - paoli memorial hospital.

Health
3
Main Line Healthcare

The professionals of main line healthcare, a key partner in a comprehensive healthcare network, are committed to providing the exceptional care that has been entrusted to us by patients and their families. main line healthcare provides…

Health
4
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
5
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

Our mission is to advance human health and well being through research, to improve the detection & treatment of disease, to rapidly transfer new technology to the clinic, and to train the next generation of scientists & physicians.

6
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
7
Main Line Health System

Main line health system is the corporate holding company for main line health and subsidiaries and one of the members of the obligated group of certain bond indebtedness for the health system. main line health system does not provide…

Health
8
Pennsylvania Medical Society

The pennsylvania medical society is the voice of pennsylvania's physicians and the patients they serve. we advance quality patient care and the ethical practice of medicine. we promote physician leadership, education, professional…

9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
10
Friends of the Jewish Museum Berlin

To promote and financially support the activities of the jewish museum berlin and similar institutions whose mission is to pursue the study of the history and culture of german-speaking jewry.

Education
11
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
12
Health Careers Futures

Primary exempt purpose - to ensure the future of southwestern pennsylvania's health care industry and to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to attract, support, and retain healthcare workers

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bryn Mawr Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Marks Colorectal Surgical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $6,094,314 · HealthLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,581,878 · HealthTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+3 more — $292,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $2,260,495 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CH…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,210,100 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE…FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $562,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISR…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $399,000 · PhilanthropyBRYN MAWR REHAB HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $57,710 · OtherSAUNDERS HOUSE — $50,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATIC — $15,000 · OtherPCOM — $15,000 · OtherJAFCO — $10,000 · OtherST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Other+6 more — $12,300 · OtherZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $130,000 · AnimalsTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE — $35,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$8,968,192Human Services$2,260,495International$1,772,100Philanthropy$399,000Other$187,010Animals$130,000Arts & Culture$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $6,094,314 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,581,878 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $2,260,495 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,210,100 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $562,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $399,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMAIN LINE HEALTH INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $130,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARKS COLORECTAL SURGICAL FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetPHILADELPHIA JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC — $10,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND — $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPhilabundance — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Slipper Camp — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds MAIN LINE HEALTH INC
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MARKS COLORECTAL SURGICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC
  • Who funds MINDING YOUR MIND
  • Who funds Philabundance
  • Who funds Golden Slipper Camp

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Barbara Brodsky Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph