Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bar-Levav Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$394k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$622kPhilanthropy$590kEducation$314kCivil Rights$235kInternational$173kHealth$138kMembership Benefit$75kPublic Benefit$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $251k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$2,200
Median grant
14
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$63,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON$48,800
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT$47,000
KOL SHALOM$30,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$25,000
MASORTI FOUNDATION$18,000
HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATION$13,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND MICHIGAN$12,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON$11,800
ADAMA FOUNDATION$10,250
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI AVOT$9,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$7,200
COMPASSION & CHOICES$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%ADAMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%ADAMA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of The Bar-Levav Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Bar-Levav Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 55 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
28

Total granted

$2.2M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+30%

Still filing today

51%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $86k · revenue +34%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +86%
  • CA
    CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • CA
    CANTOR'S ASSEMBLY
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +6%
  • JM
    JEWISH MUSIC HERITAGE PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
University of Judaism Foundation
7
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Sherit Isroel
10
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

11
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
12
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is Adama Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Health Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%39%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/68
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,497

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/57
Grantees still filing
41/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION — $426,630 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONIndividual grant recipient — $300,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYKOL SHALOM — $203,460 · OtherKOL SHALOMMASORTI FOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM IN ISRAEL — $78,000 · OtherCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC — $75,300 · OtherWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS — $59,700 · Other+60 more — $330,275 · Other+60 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $86,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFA…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $85,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …COMPASSION & CHOICES — $45,700 · Civil RightsCOMPASSIO…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $63,500 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $48,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $47,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF DUVDEVAN — $6,640 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $108,600 · InternationalPitchon Lev Inc — $13,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $10,000 · InternationalSAVE VENICE INC — $7,000 · International+7 more — $11,400 · InternationalThe Den Collective Inc — $48,000 · ReligionJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $46,900 · ReligionZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA — $17,940 · ReligionCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL — $14,550 · ReligionCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY — $12,500 · Religion+1 more — $1,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI AVOT — $63,200 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $17,960 · EducationHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $6,000 · EducationREED INSTITUTE — $5,500 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · Education+6 more — $12,950 · EducationHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $45,800 · Public BenefitHebrew Free Loan Association of DC — $11,800 · Public Benefit
Other$1,723,765Civil Rights$216,700Philanthropy$166,940International$150,500Religion$141,690Education$110,110Public Benefit$57,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $108,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $86,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC — $75,300 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $63,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI AVOT — $63,200 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $48,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Den Collective Inc — $48,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $47,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $46,900 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $45,800 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $45,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $29,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHAZON INC — $22,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $17,960 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA — $17,940 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetADAMA FOUNDATION — $15,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL — $14,550 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPitchon Lev Inc — $13,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY — $12,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHebrew Free Loan Association of DC — $11,800 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAVE VENICE INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF DUVDEVAN — $6,640 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE — $5,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA — $4,820 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE — $3,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $2,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES E SMITH JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIDAN SCHOOL — $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARET SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries — $1,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY — $750 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DARCHEI AVOT
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
  • Who funds The Den Collective Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds HAZON INC
  • Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds ADAMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL
  • Who funds Pitchon Lev Inc
  • Who funds CANTOR'S ASSEMBLY
  • Who funds Hebrew Free Loan Association of DC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC
  • Who funds SAVE VENICE INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DUVDEVAN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William Davidson FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William Davidson Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Sigmund and Sophie Rohlik Foundation · Hermelin Family Support Foundation · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · Jonathan and Beth Lowe Family Foundation · Schostak Family Support Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bar-Levav Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bar-Levav Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Bar-Levav Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph