Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Baker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$253k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MHealth$176kAnimals$71kPhilanthropy$30kScience & Tech$15kHuman Services$5kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$20,349
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$100,108
ITHACA COLLEGE$40,036
LOLLYPOP FARMS$30,027
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$20,412
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$20,349
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$20,017
SHRINER'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BOSTON$10,684
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,025
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CORTLAND COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of The Baker Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 65%.

The Baker Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    7× · 2017–2023 · $264k · revenue +59%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $249k · revenue +81%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $56k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • MS
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYRIGHT NOTES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARYS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University; the most unlike its peers is Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $286,061 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIACornell University: $263,510 · EducationCornell UniversityITHACA COLLEGE: $257,880 · EducationITHACA COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $248,680 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER+2 more: $36,684 · EducationLOLLYPOP FARMS: $101,525 · OtherLOLLYPOP FARMSNYU LANGONE HEALTH: $30,449 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEA…UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $16,526 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF H…PALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION: $15,187 · OtherPALEONTOLOGICAL…SHRINER'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BOSTON: $10,684 · OtherSHRINER'S CHILD…MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYRIGHT NOTES: $10,138 · OtherST MARYS SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $5,424 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $55,754 · HealthAmerican …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $55,638 · HealthAMERICAN …THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,480 · HealthTHE MICHA…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS: $30,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CORTLAND: $5,000 · Human ServicesCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$1,092,815Other$199,933Health$122,872Philanthropy$30,000Human Services$5,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $286,061 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $263,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $257,880 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $248,680 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $55,754 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $55,638 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $26,659 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION: $15,187 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $10,480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CORTLAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Baker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Baker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Baker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Baker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph