Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bahmann Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$330kHuman Services$157kEducation$155kArts & Culture$61kReligion$21kCrime & Legal$3kPhilanthropy$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAPLE KNOLL$27,649
UC FOUNDATION$20,000
SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME$14,565
CINCI AREA SR SERVBOOTH$8,373
HOLY FAMILY HOME-ST MARGARET$6,651
CINCI AREA SR SERVCAMBRIDGE ARMS$6,490
SANTA MARIA JORDAN CENTER$5,434
CINCI AREA SR SERVOVER THE RHINE$4,298
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$4,000
WCET$4,000
CARMEL MANOR$3,793
CINCINNATI AREA SENIOR SERVICES$2,925
HEARING SPEECH & DEAF CENTER$2,500
CINCI AREA SR SERVHILLCREST$1,897
LORD'S GYM MINISTRIES$1,453
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OTTERBEIN LEBANON: $12k → 6%OTTERBEIN LEBANON: $8k → 6%ST MARGARET HALL: $7k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $6k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $5k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $5k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $4k → 16%ST MARGARET HALL: $1k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $3k → 16%NEW PATH: $1k → 16%ST ALOYSIUS ORPHANAGE: $1k → 16%MAPLE KNOLL: $28k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$829k · 26 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
14

Total granted

$829k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+42%

Still filing today

27%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OTTERBEIN LEBANON
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +27%
  • CM
    CARMEL MANOR INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +29%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • BA
    BALEY ADULT DAY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • EC
    Every Child Succeeds
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Little Sisters of the Poor-Cincinnati

Little sisters of the poor-cincinnati care for the elderly in spirit of humble services which was received from from jeanne jugan by welcoming and serving them with love and respect until death.

Health
2
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
3
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
4
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
5
Mcv Health Care Facilities Inc

See schedule othe mission of christian village communities is to guide older adults to joyful and purposeful life experiences in a faith-filled community.care is the heart and soul of everything we do. we are devoted to maintaining the…

Health
6
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
7
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
8
Clermont Senior Services Inc

To offer a broad range of community based and Home-Care Services designed to enable older adults to remain independent and active by living healthy lives.

Human Services
9
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
10
Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus of Kentucky

The carmelite sisters of the divine heart of jesus of kentucky strive to maintain our home as a true home away from home for our residents. our residents are senior citizens and disabled residents.

—
11
Cincinnati Union Bethel

Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.

Human Services
12
Cleveland Christian Home Inc

The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Otterbein Lebanon; the most unlike its peers is Covington Ladies Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $153,284 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUC FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherUC FOUNDATIONSISTERS OF NOTRE DAME: $86,359 · OtherSISTERS OF NOTRE DAMEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $85,806 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICECINCINNATI ARTS: $50,000 · OtherCINCINNATI ARTSHOLY FAMILY HOME-ST MARGARET: $47,555 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HOME-ST MARGARET+25 more: $183,441 · Other+25 moreMAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC: $27,649 · Human ServicesMAPLE KNOL…ST MARGARET HALL: $26,945 · Human ServicesST MARGARE…OTTERBEIN LEBANON: $20,210 · Human ServicesOTTERBEIN …Every Child Succeeds: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $26,177 · HealthCARMEL MANOR INC: $16,673 · HealthThe Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation: $11,000 · Arts & CultureOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER: $1,000 · Civil RightsProKids: $1,000 · Civil RightsYour Store of the Queen City: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$746,445Human Services$79,804Health$42,850Arts & Culture$11,000Civil Rights$2,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC: $27,649 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARGARET HALL: $26,945 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $26,177 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetOTTERBEIN LEBANON: $20,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEL MANOR INC: $16,673 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Area Senior Services Inc: $14,204 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEvery Child Succeeds: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYour Store of the Queen City: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProKids: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Aloysius Orphanage: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW PATH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVINGTON LADIES HOME INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARGARET HALL ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME ↗
  • Who funds OTTERBEIN LEBANON ↗
  • Who funds CARMEL MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Area Senior Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Every Child Succeeds ↗
  • Who funds OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Your Store of the Queen City ↗
  • Who funds ProKids ↗
  • Who funds St Aloysius Orphanage ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds COVINGTON LADIES HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Evelyn W Dunn Charitable Trust McLaughlin · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged · Agnes Nordloh Charitable Trust · Williams Foundation · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bahmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bahmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bahmann Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bahmann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bahmann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph