Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bagan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$142kYouth Development$43kHuman Services$16kFood & Nutrition$16kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$525k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY PLAYERS OF CONCORD NH$9,800
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL NH$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
CONCORD COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCIATION$4,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN$4,000
GOODLIFE PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITES$3,000
THE FRIENDS PROGRAM$1,000
CONCORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,000
NH COMMUNITY LOAN FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 7%CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of The Bagan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NH; by stated purpose, 85%.

The Bagan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$269k · 22 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$269k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+247%

Still filing today

59%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PLAYERS OF CONCORD NH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $51k · revenue +78%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +251%
  • New Hampshire Preservation Alliance
    8× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CONCORD CITY AUDI
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CONCORD CITY AUDITORIUM
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CC
    CONCORD COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCIATI
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
New Bedford Preservation Society Inc

Historic preservation

—
3
Hadley Historical Society Inc

Preservation of historical memorabilia - town of Hadley MA

—
4
New Hampshire Bible Society
—
5
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc
Arts & Culture
6
Winchester Historical Society
—
7
Hampton Historical Society

The mission of the Hampton Historical Society is to increase public knowledge and understanding of the history and cultural heritage of the town of Hampton, New Hampshire, from its earliest inhabitants to the present generation. We will…

—
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
9
Holliston Historical Society
—
10
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
11
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
12
Fitchburg Historical Society

Museum and research library for history of fitchburg, massachusetts

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is Penacookhistoricalsociety. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNew Hampshire Preservation Alliance: $21,500 · OtherNew Hampshire Preservation AllianceCONCORD COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherCONCORD COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC: $16,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INCABBOT-DOWNING HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,250 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF THE AUDI: $10,200 · OtherTHE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · OtherCONCORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherNEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherTHE HUNDRED CLUB OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $8,000 · OtherGOODLIFE PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITES: $7,000 · Other+12 more: $26,250 · Other+12 moreCOMMUNITY PLAYERS OF CONCORD NH: $51,200 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY PLAYERS OF C…NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC R…+2 more: $1,250 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC: $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS …CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$194,200Arts & Culture$55,950Youth Development$33,000Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY PLAYERS OF CONCORD NH: $51,200 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC: $33,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Preservation Alliance: $21,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetABBOT-DOWNING HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,250 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetTHE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNDRED CLUB OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMerrimack Valley Day Care Service: $3,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Historical Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENACOOKHISTORICALSOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 6.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY PLAYERS OF CONCORD NH ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Preservation Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ABBOT-DOWNING HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNDRED CLUB OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTENNIAL SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Merrimack Valley Day Care Service ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds PENACOOKHISTORICALSOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Merrimack County Savings Bank Fdtn · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Concord Female Charitable Society · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Granite United Way · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bagan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bagan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bagan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph