Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Back Yard Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$126kArts & Culture$45kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$15kCommunity Improvement$8kReligion$6kInternational$3kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$676k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US Golf Association$10,000
Shared City Project$5,000
Interfaith Food Shuttle$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NC Symphony Education Program$5,000
NC State College of Arts$5,000
TWR Ministries$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%Interfaith Food Shuttle: $5k → 8%Interfaith Food Shuttle: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NJ
WV
VA
MD
NC
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 10 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$153k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+40%

Still filing today

30%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • CAROLINAS GOLF ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALVERT SPORTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -20%
  • NS
    NC State School of the Arts
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
2
Carolinas Golf Foundation

The carolinas golf foundation was formed by the carolinas golf association in 1977 to provide scholarships and funding for a variety of carolinas-based golf initiatives.

—
3
North Carolina Bar Association

The north carolina bar association is organized for the purposes of promoting and improving the administration of justice in north carolina; fostering and encouraging law reform when in the public interest; advancing the science of…

—
4
Professional Golfers Association of Carolinas Pga Section

Promote the enjoyment and involvement in the game of golf within the carolinas and to contribute to its growth by providing services to golf professionals and the golf industry within the carolinas.

Recreation & Sports
5
Three Rivers Land Trust Inc

Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland

Environment
6
Mcnc

To provide advanced electronic and information technologies to the nc education community, public health, and government agencies and to benefit economic development in nc.

Science & Tech
7
CleanAIRE Nc

To advocate for the health of all North Carolinians by pursuing equitable and collaborative solutions that address climate change and air pollution.

Environment
8
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
9
South Carolina Tennis Association Inc

To develop, maintain, and promote the game of tennis.

—
10
Ncf Carolinas Inc

Our mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and creating charitable giving strategies among individuals, families, businesses, advisors, ministries and non-profits.

Philanthropy
11
North Carolina Conservation Network

The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.

Environment
12
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Triangle Golf Foundation Inc Dba the First Tee of the Triangle; the most unlike its peers is SuNica Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALVERT SPORTS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCALVERT SPORTS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUS Golf Association: $30,000 · OtherUS Golf AssociationNC SYMPHONY EDUCATION PROGRAM: $30,000 · OtherNC SYMPHONY EDUCATION PROGRAMTRANS WORLD RADIO: $8,000 · Other+17 more: $37,231 · Other+17 moreINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $20,000 · Human ServicesINTER-FAI…CAROLINAS GOLF ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureMACMURRAY FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NFP: $5,000 · PhilanthropySuNica Inc: $3,300 · International
Other$195,231Human Services$20,000Recreation & Sports$11,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Arts & Culture$7,000Philanthropy$5,000International$3,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINAS GOLF ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACMURRAY FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NFP: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSuNica Inc: $3,300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINAS GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MACMURRAY FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds SuNica Inc ↗
  • Who funds Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Back Yard Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Back Yard Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Back Yard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph